Intrapartum care quality indicators: a literature review

被引:11
|
作者
Lazzaretto, Elisa [1 ]
Nespoli, Antonella [2 ]
Fumagalli, Simona [3 ]
Colciago, Elisabetta [4 ]
Perego, Sofia [2 ]
Locatelli, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Dept Matern, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, FBBM Monza, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Ctr Biostat Clin Epidemiol, Monza, Monza Brianza, Italy
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Unit Mother & Child, ASST Vimercate, Milan, Italy
来源
MINERVA GINECOLOGICA | 2018年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
Quality indicators; health care; Midwifery; Maternal-child nursing;
D O I
10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04177-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Quality of care is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of the maternal and newborn health, mainly with respect to care around labor and delivery and in the immediate postnatal period. The aim of this review was to identify the recommended intrapartum care indicators in order to measure the quality of midwifery care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A structured literature search was conducted in August 2017 incorporating English and Italian language studies from 1993 and onwards to identify published articles on quality standards of intrapartum care. Research was performed into the area of enquiry in electronic database (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Trip) and in relevant midwifery websites. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 369 quality indicators to measure the intrapartum care. Following a systematic process that allows to classify all indicators in domains and categories, we analyzed 268 outcome and process indicators specifically designated to monitor the intrapartum care in a low risk population. Through the identification of further exclusion criteria and semantic analogies we obtained 80 final quality indicators (39 outcome indicators and 41 process indicators). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 80 indicators that should be used to measure the quality of low risk intrapartum care. Although the majority of indicators we could monitor through hospital databases and the Italian Birth Register-CeDAP are outcome indicators, it is important to give attention also to process indicators that measure the activities performed and whether or not they are evidence-based. For a low risk population they could measure adherence with guidelines that promote and support the normality of the process.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 355
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indicators of quality of care for the Internal Medicine Departments: a review of the literature
    Bert, F.
    Brescia, V.
    Scarmozzino, A.
    Scaioli, G.
    Raciti, I. M.
    Corezzi, M.
    Voglino, G.
    Gualano, M. R.
    Siliquini, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 442 - 442
  • [2] Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review
    Dennis, Amanda
    Blanchard, Kelly
    Bessenaar, Tshego
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2017, 43 (01): : 7 - 15
  • [3] Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature
    De Vos, Maartje
    Graafmans, Wilco
    Kooistra, Mieneke
    Meijboom, Bert
    Van Der Voort, Peter
    Westert, Gert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 21 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [4] Quality Indicators for Primary Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review
    Simou, Effie
    Pliatsika, Paraskevi
    Koutsogeorgou, Eleni
    Roumeliotou, Anastasia
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (05): : E8 - E16
  • [5] Intrapartum care quality indicators: a systematic approach for achieving consensus
    Sibanda, Thabani
    Fox, Robert
    Draycott, Timothy J.
    Mahmood, Tahir
    Richmond, David
    Simms, Rebecca A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [6] Quality indicators for care of osteoarthritis in primary care settings: a systematic literature review
    Petrosyan, Yelena
    Sahakyan, Yeva
    Barnsley, Jan M.
    Kuluski, Kerry
    Liu, Barbara
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 35 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [7] Quality Indicators for Depression Treatment in Primary Care: A Systematic Literature Review
    Duhoux, Arnaud
    Fournier, Louise
    Menear, Matthew
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REVIEWS, 2011, 7 (02) : 104 - 137
  • [8] A literature review of quantitative indicators to measure the quality of labor and delivery care
    Tripathi, Vandana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 132 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [9] QUALITY-OF-CARE INDICATORS FOR WOMEN WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Weinberg, Aviva E.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    Kim, Ja-Hong
    Shekelle, Paul
    Raz, Shlomo
    Rodriguez, Larissa V.
    Litwin, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 5 - 5
  • [10] Health care quality indicators on the management of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a literature review
    Strombeck, Britta
    Petersson, Ingemar F.
    Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 52 (02) : 382 - 390