RATIONAL CHOICE IN COLLECTIVE PROTESTS

被引:60
|
作者
OBERSCHALL, AR
机构
[1] University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1043463194006001006
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
A rational choice (RC) formulation of value-expectancy theory of participation in collective protests is described and applied to East German popular protests against the Communist regime in 1989. The heart of the RC model is a production function for collective good attainment, an assurance process that overcomes free rider tendencies and strategic interaction based on expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 100
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rational Choice
    Gintis, Herbert
    ECONOMIC RECORD, 2012, 88 (280) : 153 - 156
  • [32] Rational Choice
    Roy, Olivier
    ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 28 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [33] Rational choice
    Brennan, Geoffrey
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 42 (01) : 181 - 183
  • [34] Why rational choice? Reconciling Kornai with rational choice theory
    Kaiser, Adam J.
    Leeson, Peter T.
    ACTA OECONOMICA, 2023, 73 : 75 - 86
  • [35] Collective identity in collective action: evidence from the 2020 summer BLM protests
    Kann, Claudia
    Hashash, Sarah
    Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary
    Alvarez, R. Michael
    FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 5
  • [36] Choice and religion: A critique of rational choice
    Montgomery, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 51 (04): : 752 - 754
  • [37] Rational Choice versus Lawful Choice
    Katz, Leo
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2014, 170 (01): : 105 - 121
  • [38] Choice and religion - A critique of rational choice
    Martin, D
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2001, (5108): : 34 - 34
  • [39] Choice and religion: A critique of rational choice
    Becker, PE
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION, 2002, 82 (01): : 141 - 142
  • [40] Is rational choice theory still a rational choice of theory? A response to Opp
    Manzo, Gianluca
    SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 2013, 52 (03): : 361 - 382