Development of Design Requirements for a Cognitive Assistant in Space Missions Beyond Low Earth Orbit

被引:7
|
作者
Tokadli, Guliz [1 ]
Dorneich, Michael C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Adapt Cognit Syst Lab, Ames, IA USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Ames, IA USA
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
cognitive systems engineering; decision making; function allocation; human automation interaction; level of automation; problem solving; reasoning; cognitive work analysis; decision support; space;
D O I
10.1177/1555343417733159
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study describes the development of requirements for a cognitive assistant (CA) for use onboard a space vehicle/station. For missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO), delayed communication will limit mission control's ability to support the space crew in real time. During off-nominal situations, where no procedures have been developed prior to missions, crews must develop responses in real time and may increasingly rely on automation. A systematic approach was used to model the domain knowledge of the collaborative decision-making process of current space operations, extrapolate to missions beyond LEO, and develop the design requirements for a CA. Document analysis and interviews were conducted to create an abstraction hierarchy and a decision-action diagram of the cognitive functions currently performed by space crew, mission control, and onboard automation. These domain models were extrapolated to missions beyond LEO by identifying the breakpoints where current decision-making processes would break down due to increased communication delay between mission control and the space crew. Design requirements were identified for future CA systems that offer real-time decision-making support to mitigate the negative effect of limited support in off-nominal situations. The approach developed for this research can be generalized to identify the design requirements for future support systems in domains beyond space operations.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 152
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Space debris in low-Earth orbit
    Nelson, TL
    SPACE 98, 1998, : 804 - 808
  • [32] Space Occupancy in Low-Earth Orbit
    Bombardelli, Claudio
    Falco, Gabriele
    Amato, Davide
    Rosengren, Aaron J.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2021, 44 (04) : 684 - 700
  • [33] Nanosatellite swarm missions in low Earth orbit using laser propulsion
    Felicetti, L.
    Santoni, F.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 179 - 187
  • [34] A wide field auroral imager (WFAI) for Low Earth Orbit missions
    Bannister, N. P.
    Bunce, E. J.
    Cowley, S. W. H.
    Fairbend, R.
    Fraser, G. W.
    Hamilton, F. J.
    Lapington, J. S.
    Lees, J. E.
    Lester, M.
    Milan, S. E.
    Pearson, J. F.
    Price, G. J.
    Willingale, R.
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2007, 25 (02) : 519 - 532
  • [35] Planning lunar observations for satellite missions in low-Earth orbit
    Wilson, Truman
    Xiong, Xiaoxiong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 13 (02):
  • [36] A HIGH EARTH, LUNAR RESONANT ORBIT FOR LOWER COST SPACE SCIENCE MISSIONS
    Gangestad, Joseph W.
    Henning, Gregory A.
    Persinger, Randy
    Ricker, George R.
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2013, PTS I-III, 2014, 150 : 1585 - 1604
  • [37] The effects of microgravity and space radiation on cardiovascular health: From low-Earth orbit and beyond
    Patel, Smit
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2020, 30
  • [38] Accelerating architecture for low-Earth orbit and beyond
    Hall, Theodore W.
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2022, 60 (11) : 68 - 68
  • [39] Feasibility of Synchronized CubeSat Missions from Low Earth Orbit to Near-Earth Asteroids
    Jaworski, Sintia
    Kindracki, Jan
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2020, 57 (06) : 1232 - 1245
  • [40] Spacecraft Design-for-Demise implementation strategy & decision-making methodology for low earth orbit missions
    Waswa, Peter M. B.
    Elliot, Michael
    Hoffman, Jeffrey A.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (09) : 1627 - 1637