Current and future methods for measuring breast density: a brief comparative review

被引:0
|
作者
Sak, Mark A. [1 ]
Littrup, Peter J. [2 ,3 ]
Duric, Neb [1 ,2 ]
Mullooly, Maeve [4 ,5 ]
Sherman, Mark E. [6 ]
Gierach, Gretchen L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Karmanos Canc Inst, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Delphinus Med Technol, Plymouth, MI 48170 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[4] NCI, Hormonal & Reprod Epidemiol Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NCI, Canc Prevent Fellowship Program, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] NCI, Breast & Gynecol Canc Res Grp, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer risk; breast density; mammography; ultrasound tomography;
D O I
10.2217/BMT.15.13
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast density is one of the strongest predictors of breast cancer risk. Women with the densest breasts are four- to six-times more likely to develop cancer compared with those with the lowest densities. Breast density is generally assessed using mammographic imaging; however, this approach has limitations. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound tomography are some alternative imaging modalities that can aid mammography in patient screening and the measurement of breast density. As breast density becomes more commonly discussed, knowledge of the advantages and limitations of breast density as a marker of risk will become more critical. This review article discusses the relationship between breast density and breast cancer risk, lists the benefits and drawbacks of using multiple different imaging modalities to measure density and briefly discusses how breast density will be applied to aid in breast cancer prevention and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 221
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The current status and future prospects of kesterite solar cells: a brief review
    Liu, Xiaolei
    Feng, Yu
    Cui, Hongtao
    Liu, Fangyang
    Hao, Xiaojing
    Conibeer, Gavin
    Mitzi, David B.
    Green, Martin
    PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2016, 24 (06): : 879 - 898
  • [22] Experimental Methods for Measuring Potential and Current Density Distributions at Bipolar Electrodes
    Villani, Elena
    Inagi, Shinsuke
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2025, 97 (11) : 5837 - 5846
  • [23] Contained Morcellation: Review of Current Methods and Future Directions
    Taylan, Enes
    Sahin, Cagdas
    Zeybek, Burak
    Akdemir, Ali
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2017, 4
  • [24] Breast Cancer Segmentation Methods: Current Status and Future Potentials
    Michael, Epimack
    Ma, He
    Li, Hong
    Kulwa, Frank
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [25] Comparative study of two different measuring methods for corona current pulses
    Wang, Zhenguo
    Lu, Tiebing
    Liu, Yang
    Bian, Xingming
    Li, Xuebao
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2017, 88 : 134 - 138
  • [26] Breast Density: Current Knowledge, Assessment Methods, and Clinical Implications
    Chalfant, James S.
    Hoyt, Anne C.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (04) : 357 - 370
  • [27] Current and potential methods for measuring emotion in tourism experiences: a review
    Li, Shanshi
    Scott, Noel
    Walters, Gabby
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2015, 18 (09) : 805 - 827
  • [28] A Brief Review on Measuring Methods of Thermal Conductivity of Organic and Hybrid Thermoelectric Materials
    Wang, Hanfu
    Chu, Weiguo
    Chen, Guangming
    ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2019, 5 (11)
  • [29] Current Innovative Methods of Fetal pH Monitoring-A Brief Review
    Bohiltea, Roxana-Elena
    Mihai, Bianca Margareta
    Ducu, Ionita
    Cioca, Ana-Maria
    Bohiltea, Alexia-Teodora
    Iordache, Ana-Maria
    Iordache, Stefan-Marian
    Grigorescu, Cristiana Eugenia Ana
    Marinescu, Silviu
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [30] Current MRI Methods for the Assessment of Pathologic Prostate: A Brief Review for Clinicians
    Salazar-Ruiz, Shirley-Yoselin
    Chilaca-Rosas, Maria-Fatima
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Irma-Gabriela
    Corona-Cedillo, Roberto
    Ternovoy, Sergey K.
    Roldan-Valadez, Ernesto
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (08) : 808 - 816