Who Are the Real Victims of Insider Trading? Why Current Insider-Trading Law Is Unethical
被引:0
|
作者:
Dobson, John
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Finance, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USACalif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Finance, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
Dobson, John
[1
]
机构:
[1] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Finance, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
insider trading;
Securities and Exchange Commission;
market efficiency;
securities law;
D O I:
10.5840/bpej2012313/423
中图分类号:
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
In this paper I argue that the real and only victims of insider trading are those being wrongfully prosecuted under the current broad interpretation of Rule 10(b)-5 of the Securities Exchange Act. The term 'insider trading' has no clear legal definition and thus lends itself to prosecutorial overreach. I argue that such overreach characterizes the numerous insider trading investigations and prosecutions currently being pursued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Rather than any valid application of securities law, these prosecutions reflect political opportunism and the influence of powerful special interests within the securities industry. I conclude by advocating that Rule 10(b)-5 be applied as originally intended, namely to deter active securities fraud and price manipulation only.