MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR DETERMINING COMPUTER PREFERENCE INDEX

被引:0
|
作者
Kasim, Maznah Mat [1 ]
Ibrahim, Haslinda [1 ]
Bataineh, Mahmoud S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utara Malaysia, UUM Coll Arts & Sci, Quantitat Sci Program, Changlun, Kedah, Malaysia
关键词
Attribute; Computer preference index (CPI); Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); Rank order centroid; Simple additive weighting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In helping consumers to make a wise decision in purchasing a personal computer (PC), the use of multi-criteria decision analysis methods is a way to provide ranking of the attributes of PCs and to construct the computer preference index (CPI). This paper employs the Rank Ordered Centroid (ROC) method to do the ranking. The findings reveal that the most important attribute is the CPU, followed by the hard drive, the price, the memory card, the warranty, the size, the screen resolution, the Ethernet, the weight and the DVD. Whilst, the CPI is constructed by using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), called the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. Analysis of data from 25 PCs from four brands, Toshiba, Dell, HP Compaq and Acer, presents the CPI. The resulted CPI shows that two HP Compaq models, Presario V3632 and V3653 are preferred most, while, Acer Aspire 4920-5AA0516MI is the least preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 148
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria decision making methods for designing optomechatronic systems
    Institute for Sustainable Technologies, National Research Institute, ul. Pulaskiego 6/10, Radom
    PL-26-600, Poland
    Solid State Phenomena, (188-193): : 188 - 193
  • [22] Cognitive support methods for multi-criteria expert decision making
    Bisdorff, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 119 (02) : 379 - 387
  • [23] A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Castillo-Lopez, Elena
    Rodriguez-Hernandez, Jorge
    Canteras-Jordana, Juan Carlos
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 45 : 151 - 162
  • [24] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [25] Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry
    Dozic, Slavica
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 79
  • [26] Strategic manipulation of preference information in multi-criteria group decision methods
    Vetschera, R
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2005, 14 (05) : 393 - 414
  • [27] Strategic Manipulation of Preference Information in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Methods
    Rudolf Vetschera
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2005, 14 : 393 - 414
  • [28] Modifying the analysis made by water quality index using multi-criteria decision making methods
    Yousefi, Hossein
    Zahedi, Sina
    Niksokhan, Mohammad Hossein
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 138 : 309 - 318
  • [29] The Preference Ranking of Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Methods Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Operational Research Centre in Healthcare, Near East University, TRNC, Mersin 10, Nicosia
    99138, Cyprus
    不详
    28903, Spain
    不详
    99138, Cyprus
    不详
    NY
    10065, United States
    不详
    IET. Conf. Proc., 1600, 14 (314-320):
  • [30] Multi-criteria decision making with overlapping criteria
    Abdulla, Mohammed Shahid
    IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 24 (03) : 137 - 142