COMPARISON OF 3 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS FOR THE SCREENING OF AUTOANTIBODIES TO EXTRACTABLE NUCLEAR ANTIGENS

被引:18
|
作者
JASKOWSKI, TD [1 ]
SCHRODER, C [1 ]
MARTINS, TB [1 ]
MOURITSEN, L [1 ]
HILL, HR [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH, MED CTR, DEPT PATHOL, SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108 USA
关键词
ANTINUCLEAR ANTIBODIES; EXTRACTABLE NUCLEAR ANTIGENS; AUTOANTIBODIES; OUCHTERLONY DOUBLE DIFFUSION; ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.1860090304
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The initial screening test used in the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases is based on the detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IFA). When the ANA screen is positive, it is often useful to determine the specificity of the autoantibody to a series of extractable nuclear antigens (ENA), a procedure that has been classically performed by double immunodiffusion. Testing large numbers of clinical specimens for autoantibodies to ENA by double diffusion techniques can be time-consuming and expensive. ENA screening systems that employ enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technology have recently become commercially available. We compared three EIA ENA assays to classic Ouchterlony double diffusion techniques. Furthermore, the sensitivity of each antigen and methodology (including ANA immunofluorescence using HEp-2 cells) was tested using ENA positive sera possessing single autoantibodies. Two of the three EIAs that detected immunoglobulin G type autoantibodies to Smith (Sm), ribonucleoprotein (RNP), Sjogren's syndrome-associated antigens Ro (SSA) and La (SSB), were provided by INOVA and Sigma Diagnostics. A third EIA, which also included scleroderma-associated antigen 70 (SCL-70/DNA-topoisomerase 1) and histidyl-tRNA synthetase (JO-1) in addition to the four previously stated antigens, was provided by Clark Laboratories. This latter ENA screen detected IgG, IgA, and IgM type autoantibodies. Included in the study were sera covering a wide variety of anti-nuclear and other autoantibodies. Sensitivity was 100% for all EIA ENA screens when compared to Ouchterlony double diffusion and specificity exceeded 95% in each case. Sensitivity studies showed Ouchterlony to be less sensitive than EIA when detecting low levels of autoantibodies to ENA. After the detection of ANA antibody by IFA, EIAs utilizing combined antigens can be used to screen large numbers of clinical specimens for autoantibodies against SSA, SSB, Sm, RNP/SCL-70, and Jo-1 prior to confirmation by Ouchterlony double diffusion. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 172
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ANTIBODY SCREENING OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE IMMUNOGLOBULINS ERYTHROCYTE-ANTIBODIES, HLA-ANTIBODIES AND AUTOANTIBODIES
    HOPPE, I
    BLUT, 1979, 39 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [42] COMPARISON OF 4 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE RAPID ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS WITH CYTOTOXIN ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN(S) FROM STOOL SPECIMENS
    MERZ, CS
    KRAMER, C
    FORMAN, M
    GLUCK, L
    MILLS, K
    SENFT, K
    STEIMAN, I
    WALLACE, N
    CHARACHE, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (05) : 1142 - 1147
  • [43] A COMPARISON OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE LUMINESCENCE ENHANCED ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS WITH IN-HOUSE NON-RADIOISOTOPIC ASSAYS FOR THYROXINE BINDING GLOBULIN AND TOTAL THYROXINE
    WOOD, WG
    ROHDE, C
    JACOBS, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 26 (03): : 135 - 140
  • [44] Clinical performance evaluation of a novel rapid response chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens
    Bentow, Chelsea
    Swart, Andreas
    Wu, Jason
    Seaman, Andrea
    Manfredi, Mariangela
    Infantino, Maria
    Benucci, Maurizio
    Lakos, Gabriella
    Mahler, Michael
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2013, 424 : 141 - 147
  • [45] SUBSETS OF AUTOANTIBODIES TO EXTRACTABLE NUCLEAR ANTIGENS (ENA) AS ASSAYED BY ELISA CORRELATE WITH SPECIFIC CLINICAL ABNORMALITIES IN SLE
    WARLOW, RS
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1986, 15 (01) : 57 - 67
  • [46] Comparison of three commercially available assays for cystic fibrosis population screening
    Holtegaard, T
    Highsmith, WE
    Dawson, DB
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 6 (04): : 436 - 436
  • [47] Clinical comparison of two commercially available lyme screening ELISA assays
    Dudley, T. A.
    Erwin, D.
    Ewell, A.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (06) : A141 - A141
  • [48] Prospective comparison of ELISA and immunodiffusion for detection of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.
    Schmitz, JL
    Freeman, K
    Orton, S
    Folds, JD
    CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 115 : S264 - S265
  • [49] Evaluation of four commercially available Epstein-Barr virus enzyme immunoassays with an immunofluorescence assay as the reference method
    Gärtner, BC
    Hess, RD
    Bandt, D
    Kruse, A
    Rethwilm, A
    Roemer, K
    Mueller-Lantzsch, N
    CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) : 78 - 82
  • [50] Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Method Comparison Between Two Commercially Available Automated Immunoassays
    Chin, Alex C.
    Ramsey, Clayton H.
    Roberts, William L.
    Ritchie, James C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 134 (03) : 504 - 505