MK-801 IMPAIRS RECOGNITION MEMORY IN RHESUS-MONKEYS - COMPARISON WITH CHOLINERGIC DRUGS

被引:0
|
作者
OGURA, H [1 ]
AIGNER, TG [1 ]
机构
[1] NIMH,NEUROPSYCHOL LAB,BLDG 49,ROOM IB80,9000 ROCKVILLE PIKE,BETHESDA,MD 20892
来源
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS | 1993年 / 266卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Both N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and cholinergic receptors are thought to participate in processes of learning and memory. The effects of the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine) MK-801 on recognition memory in rhesus monkeys performing a computer-automated version of delayed nonmatching-to-sample DNMS were compared to those of the cholinergic compounds physostigmine and scopolamine. In the sample phase of the test, 20 symbols were presented sequentially every 30 sec on a color monitor fitted with a touch-sensitive screen. These symbols were then presented again in the same order as before, but each symbol was now paired with a different novel symbol. A monkey was rewarded with a food pellet if it touched the symbol in the sample phase and the previously unseen symbol in the choice phase. Physostigmine (3.2, 1 0 and 32 mug/kg), scopolamine (3.2, 10, 17.8 and 32 mug/kg) or MK-801 (3.2, 10 and 32 mug/kg) was injected i.m. 20, 20 and 30 min before testing, respectively. The highest doses of both MK-801 and scopolamine significantly impaired performance. In addition, scopolamine, but not MK-801, prolonged response latency, whereas MK-801, but not scopolamine, increased response bias. Physostigmine produced a small but significant increase in correct responses at the intermediate dose, but not at the highest dose. These results suggest that both the glutamatergic and the cholinergic systems participate in visual recognition memory in monkeys, though probably by different mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DYSTONIA INDUCED BY COMBINED TREATMENT WITH L-DOPA AND MK-801 IN PARKINSONIAN MONKEYS
    RUPNIAK, NMJ
    BOYCE, S
    STEVENTON, MJ
    IVERSEN, SD
    MARSDEN, CD
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 32 (01) : 103 - 105
  • [42] CONTINUOUS ICV INFUSION OF SCOPOLAMINE IMPAIRS SUSTAINED ATTENTION OF RHESUS-MONKEYS
    CALLAHAN, MJ
    KINSORA, JJ
    HARBAUGH, RE
    REEDER, TM
    DAVIS, RE
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 1993, 14 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [43] THE OPIATE QUASIWITHDRAWAL SYNDROME IN RHESUS-MONKEYS - COMPARISON OF NALOXONE-PRECIPITATED WITHDRAWAL TO EFFECTS OF CHOLINERGIC AGENTS
    KATZ, JL
    VALENTINO, RJ
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 84 (01) : 12 - 15
  • [44] MK-801 DISRUPTS RECONSOLIDATION OF NEW MEMORY AND IMPAIRS OLD MEMORY AT INSTRUMENTAL ALIMENTARY BEHAVIOR IN 8-ARM RADIAL MAZE IN RATS
    Zaichenko, M., I
    Zakirov, Ph Kh
    Markevich, V. A.
    Grigoryan, G. A.
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 2020, 70 (06) : 770 - 782
  • [45] EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE NEONATAL TEMPORAL-LOBE LESIONS ON VISUAL RECOGNITION MEMORY IN RHESUS-MONKEYS
    BACHEVALIER, J
    MISHKIN, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 14 (04): : 2128 - 2139
  • [46] Kynurenic acid prevented social recognition deficits induced by MK-801 in rats
    Hlinák, Z
    Krejcí, I
    PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 52 (06) : 805 - 808
  • [47] ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF PHENCYCLIDINE-LIKE DRUGS IN RHESUS-MONKEYS
    FRANCE, CP
    SNYDER, AM
    WOODS, JH
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 1989, 250 (01): : 197 - 201
  • [48] Effects of olanzapine and sertindole on MK-801 induced visual memory deficit in mice
    Mutlu, O.
    Komsuoglu, I.
    Ulak, G.
    Erden, F.
    Akar, F. Yildiz
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 : S559 - S559
  • [49] EFFECTS OF MK-801 ON LEARNING AND MEMORY AS ASSESSED USING A NOVEL WATER MAZE
    KANT, GJ
    WRIGHT, WL
    ROBINSON, TN
    DANGELO, CP
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1991, 39 (02) : 479 - 485
  • [50] COMPARISON OF THE REINFORCING PROPERTIES OF COCAINE AND PROCAINE IN RHESUS-MONKEYS
    JOHANSON, CE
    AIGNER, T
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1981, 15 (01) : 49 - 53