Optimum Plot Size and Number of Replicates to Evaluate the Yield of Sweet Potato in Uncovered Soil and Mulch

被引:0
|
作者
Richard A, Rodriguez [1 ]
Cicero, Nogueira [2 ]
Roxanna, Rosales [2 ]
Patricia, da Silva [2 ]
Helena, Camilo de Moraes [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Republ, CENUR Litoral Norte, Dept Agua, Sede Salto, Gral Rivera 1350, Salto, Uruguay
[2] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Colegio Politecn, Av Roraima 1000,Campus UFSM,Predio 70, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
来源
AGROCIENCIA-URUGUAY | 2018年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
uniformity test; Ipomoea batatas; number of repetitions; experimental precision; plot size;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine the optimal experimental plot size and the number of repetitions to evaluate the yield in sweet potato, cultivated in uncovered soil, and soil covered with mulched plastic. Two uniformity trials were performed simultaneously, in uncovered soil or with black plastic and mulch coverage, both without irrigation. The planting density was 2.5 plants m-2. Two plots of 120 plants were established, and each plant was defined as a basic unit. The sweet potato variety used was ` RBS Cuia'. The plot size was determined by the method of maximum modified coverage and the segmented linear model with plateau response. The number of repetitions was estimated based on the minimum significant difference by Tukey test (p = 0.05). The average values of yield in uncovered soil and soil covered with mulch were 0.50 and 1.07 kg plant(-1), respectively. The coefficient of variation showed greater variability dispersion in uncovered soil conditions. Between the two methods used to determine the plot size, a difference of 2.0 and 1.6 basic units with mulch and in bare soil, respectively, was found. The optimal experimental plot size with mulch and in bare soil was 12.5 m(2) and 32.5 m(2), respectively. The number of repetitions to determine 50 % minimum significant difference with and in bare ground was 9 and 12 repetitions, respectively, up to 30 treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 97
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in soil hydraulic conductivity in sweet potato field with living mulch
    Nishiwaki, Junko
    Koseki, Takuya
    Asagi, Naomi
    Saito, Hirotaka
    Sidle, Roy C.
    AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL LETTERS, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [22] Influence of the plot size and number of replicates on the precision of perennial arboreal plant trials
    Rossetti, AG
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2002, 37 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [23] ESTIMATES OF OPTIMUM PLOT SIZE AND SHAPE AND REPLICATE NUMBER FOR FORAGE YIELD OF ALFALFA-BROMEGRASS MIXTURES
    TORRIE, JH
    SCHMIDT, DR
    TENPAS, GH
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1963, 55 (03) : 258 - &
  • [24] OPTIMUM PLOT SIZE AND SHAPE ESTIMATES FOR PEA YIELD TRIALS
    ZUHLKE, TA
    GRITTON, ET
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1969, 61 (06) : 905 - &
  • [25] ESTIMATION OF OPTIMUM PLOT SIZE AND SHAPE FOR SAFFLOWER YIELD TRIALS
    WIEDEMANN, AM
    LEININGER, LN
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1963, 55 (03) : 222 - &
  • [26] OPTIMUM PLOT SIZE AND NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS IN PAPAYA FIELD EXPERIMENT
    Schmildt, Edilson Romais
    Schmildt, Omar
    Cruz, Cosme Damiao
    Cattaneo, Laercio Francisco
    Ferreguetti, Geraldo Antonio
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA, 2016, 38 (02)
  • [27] Optimum plot size and number of replications related to selective precision
    Storck, Lindolfo
    Lopes, Sidinei Jose
    Lucio, Alessandro Dal'Col
    Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2011, 41 (03): : 390 - 396
  • [28] YIELD AND SOIL INSECT RESISTANCE IN SWEET POTATO CLONES
    Nobrega, Daiane da Silva
    Peixoto, Jose Ricardo
    Vilela, Michelle Souza
    da Silva Nobrega, Ane Kelly
    Santos, Elaine Caetano
    Costa, Anne Pinheiro E.
    Carmona, Ricardo
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2019, 35 (06): : 1773 - 1779
  • [29] Sweet potato yield under different soil managements
    Ros, Amarilis Beraldo
    Tavares Filho, Joao
    de Cesare Barbosa, Graziela Moraes
    BRAGANTIA, 2013, 72 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [30] OPTIMUM PLOT SIZE FOR ESTIMATING YIELD OF BLACKGRAM (PHASEOLUS-MUNGO)
    RAO, CS
    PRASAD, ASR
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1991, 61 (08): : 574 - 578