RESPONSES OF SOIL INSECTS TO MIXED AND CONTIGUOUS PLANTINGS OF RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE SWEET-POTATO CULTIVARS

被引:3
|
作者
SCHALK, JM [1 ]
JONES, A [1 ]
DUKES, PD [1 ]
BURNHAM, KP [1 ]
机构
[1] COLORADO STATE UNIV,COLORADO COOPERAT FISHERIES & WILDLIFE RES UNIT,FT COLLINS,CO 80523
关键词
IPOMOEA-BATATAS; PLANT RESISTANCE; WIREWORMS; FLEA BEETLES; GRUBS; CUCUMBER BEETLES; CONODERUS SPP; DIABROTICA SPP; SYSTENA SPP; CHAETOCNEMA-CONFINIS; PLECTRIS-ALIENA; PHYLLOPHAGA-EPHILDA;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.27.10.1089
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
This study was designed to determine if the preference of soil insects for sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] cultivars is affected by the proximity of resistant or susceptible plant cultivars at various spacings. Comparisons were made for damage caused by wireworms (Conoderus spp.), Diabrotica spp., Systena spp., sweetpotato flea beetles (Chaetocnema confinis Crotch), and grubs (Plectris aliena Chapin; Phyllophaga ephilida Say) in previously reported resistant and susceptible cultivars. Field plots were planted with a resistant cultivar, a susceptible cultivar, or the two cultivars intermixed. Large roots exhibited more insect damage than medium and small roots. When plant spacing was increased, roots were larger and insect damage more severe. Mixed plantings of resistant and susceptible cultivars significantly reduced insect damage in the susceptible plants. Planting regime did not influence insect damage for the resistant cultivars.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1091
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECTS OF RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE SWEET-POTATO BREEDING CLONES AND CULTIVARS ON THE SOUTHERN ROOT-KNOT PATHOGEN, MELOIDOGYNE-INCOGNITA
    DUKES, PD
    HAMILTON, MG
    JONES, A
    SCHALK, JM
    HORTSCIENCE, 1987, 22 (05) : 726 - 726
  • [22] RESPONSES OF 4 SWEET-POTATO CULTIVARS TO LEVELS OF SHADE .2. TUBERIZATION
    ROBERTSNKRUMAH, LB
    WILSON, LA
    FERGUSON, TU
    TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1986, 63 (04): : 265 - 270
  • [23] IDENTIFICATION OF SWEET-POTATO CULTIVARS USING ISOZYME ANALYSIS
    KENNEDY, LS
    THOMPSON, PG
    HORTSCIENCE, 1991, 26 (03) : 300 - 302
  • [24] COMPETITION BETWEEN SWEET-POTATO CULTIVARS IN SMALL PLOTS
    WALKER, DW
    RANDLE, WM
    HORTSCIENCE, 1987, 22 (04) : 657 - 657
  • [25] EVALUATION OF SELECTED SWEET-POTATO CULTIVARS FOR SEEDPIECE PROPAGATION
    PHILLS, BR
    ALLEN, BM
    HORTSCIENCE, 1979, 14 (02) : 124 - 124
  • [26] SWEET-POTATO SOIL INSECT AND NEMATODE CONTROL
    HAMILTON, MG
    GRIFFIN, RP
    HORTSCIENCE, 1980, 15 (03) : 279 - 279
  • [27] SENSORY RESPONSES TO SWEET-POTATO CONVENIENCE PRODUCTS
    JOHNSON, LD
    HUNT, SK
    CONTEH, DB
    HORTSCIENCE, 1987, 22 (05) : 1059 - 1059
  • [28] Comparison of defense responses between potato cultivars susceptible and resistant to Andean Potato Mottle Virus
    Jacinto, T
    Brioso, PST
    Machado, OLT
    PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS, 2001, 8 (02): : 109 - 114
  • [29] Physiology and yield of sweet-potato cultivars depending on harvesting time
    Fernandes de Queiroga, Roberto Cleiton
    dos Santos, Maria Auxiliadora
    de Menezes, Marcio Andre
    Gomes Vieira, Clemens Paula
    Silva, Maria da Conceicao
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2007, 25 (03) : 371 - 374
  • [30] EVIDENCE OF DIFFERENTIAL NITROGEN UPTAKE IN 2 SWEET-POTATO CULTIVARS
    WALKER, DW
    POCHE, KJ
    POCHE, EM
    HORTSCIENCE, 1988, 23 (05) : 828 - 828