Perceptions of Students and Educators on the Impact of No Child Left Behind: Some Will and Some Won't

被引:4
|
作者
Harriman, Nancy E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bath Publ Sch, Bath, ME 04530 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/875687050502400112
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
How do students and educators perceive the No Child Left Behind law and its impact ? The author reports on structured interviews with 15 staff members K-12 and 37 middle level students in a small, northeastern coastal community. The responses of students included three themes: fairness to subgroups, student effort and self-determination, and apprehensions about changing schools. Issues identified by teachers, special educators and administrators included: desirable effects of accountability; concerns about fairness to students with disabilities and diverse learning needs; conflicts between state and federal requirements; and negative effects on teaching, learning and allocation of resources. Most respondents recommended that the law be amended to achieve the original intent. Of particular relevance to special educators in small or rural schools is the overall challenge identified by educators of finding time to balance the often apparently competing demands of existing initiatives such as individualized instruction, curriculum of place, community involvement, and development of functional skills, with the additional bureaucratic and assessment related demands required by No Child Left Behind.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 69
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Some benefit, some are left behind: NAFTA and educational attainment in the United States
    Gomez-Ramirez, Leopoldo
    Padilla-Romo, Maria
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2022, 60 (04) : 1581 - 1606
  • [22] No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities in Rural and Small Schools
    McLaughlin, Margaret J.
    Embler, Sandra
    Hernandez, Glenda
    Caron, Elizabeth
    RURAL SPECIAL EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2005, 24 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [23] No Child Left Behind and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Examining Special Educators' Outcomes
    Nguyen, Tuan D.
    Redding, Christopher
    Gilmour, Allison F.
    Bettini, Elizabeth
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2024, 45 (03) : 139 - 151
  • [24] Guaranteeing Maximin Shares: Some Agents Left Behind
    Hosseini, Hadi
    Searns, Andrew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2021, 2021, : 238 - 244
  • [25] Research in the wake of the no child left behind act: Why the controversies will continue and some suggestions for controversial research
    Brigham, FJ
    Gustashaw, WE
    Wiley, AL
    Brigham, MS
    BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2004, 29 (03) : 300 - 310
  • [26] SOME NOTES ON STUDENTS T
    NELSON, LS
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 16 (01) : 64 - 65
  • [27] Why Won't They Sing? Some Thoughts on the Silence in the Pews
    Ballou, Mary Jane
    SACRED MUSIC, 2012, 139 (01): : 67 - 70
  • [28] There's Some I Just Won't Let Die
    Seuss, Diane
    MISSOURI REVIEW, 2013, 36 (02): : 153 - 153
  • [29] A Test Impact Study under the No Child Left Behind Act
    Garcia Laborda, Jesus
    PORTA LINGUARUM, 2012, (17) : 237 - 238
  • [30] The Effect of No Child Left Behind on Rural Students with Low Incidence Disabilities
    Collins, Belva C.
    Hawkins, Sarah
    Keramidas, Cathy Galyon
    Mclaren, Elizabeth M.
    Schuster, John W.
    Slevin, Barbara N.
    Spoelker, Denise Lacy
    RURAL SPECIAL EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2005, 24 (01) : 48 - 53