A FRAMEWORK FOR TARGETING SOIL CONSERVATION POLICY

被引:7
|
作者
DUFF, SN
STONEHOUSE, DP
BLACKBURN, DJ
HILTS, SG
机构
[1] UNIV GUELPH, DEPT AGR ECON & BUSINESS, GUELPH N1G 2W1, ONTARIO, CANADA
[2] UNIV GUELPH, DEPT RURAL EXTENS STUDIES, GUELPH N1G 2W1, ONTARIO, CANADA
[3] UNIV GUELPH, DEPT LAND RESOURCE SCI, GUELPH N1G 2W1, ONTARIO, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0743-0167(92)90053-9
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comprehensive framework and methodology in an attempt to direct policy solutions to soil and water degradation from water-related soil erosion. The perspective adopted by this research is social science in nature. Past research on the adoption of soil conservation practices has tended to concentrate on the micro (individual) level of inquiry and has tended to ignore environmental (i.e. biophysical) factors. Previous models of the adoption of soil conservation practices are reviewed and critiqued. Based on the strengths and limitations of these approaches, a comprehensive analytical framework that identifies and relates micro (e.g. farm and farmer characteristics) and macro (e.g. institutional arrangements, fiscal and monetary policies, agricultural policies) factors influencing the adoption and continued use of soil conservation measures is proposed. It is hypothesized that economic and institutional constraints will exert the greatest influence on decisions to use land stewardship practices when problem awareness exists at the micro level. Based on this framework, a research methodology is developed to classify the farm population into relatively homogeneous sub-groups based on farmers' receptivity to the adoption and use of currently available and prospective conservation practices. These groupings could then form the basis for targeting a range of policies, programs, and other measures appropriate for each group.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 410
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An ecological perspective of soil conservation policy and law in Australia
    Hannam, I
    TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE LAND USE, VOLS I & II: FURTHERING COOPERATION BETWEEN PEOPLE AND INSTITUTIONS, 1998, 31 : 945 - 952
  • [32] Soil and water conservation policy within the United States
    Napier, TL
    Napier, SM
    SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMS: SUCCESSES AND FAILURES, 2000, : 83 - 94
  • [33] Constructions of an evaluation framework for soil and water conservation techniques
    Luo, Han
    Hu, Xiaoning
    Xie, Yongsheng
    Wang, Jijun
    Guo, Mancai
    CATENA, 2020, 186
  • [34] Farm-Credit Policy as a Factor in Soil Conservation
    Johnson, E. C.
    JOURNAL OF LAND AND PUBLIC UTILITY ECONOMICS, 1939, 15 (04): : 377 - 382
  • [35] Evaluating Soil Conservation Effectiveness: An Investigation of Spatial Targeting, Conservation Adoption, and Financial Incentives
    Fowler, Ames F.
    Boll, Jan
    King, Allyson Beall
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 58 (06): : 1341 - 1357
  • [36] TARGETING SOIL CONSERVATION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS - AN ECONOMIC MODELING APPROACH
    SEITA, PP
    OSBORN, CT
    BARBARIKA, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 69 (05) : 1092 - 1092
  • [37] SOIL-EROSION, SOIL CONSERVATION AND AGRICULTURAL POLICY FOR ARABLE LAND IN THE UK
    ROBINSON, DA
    BLACKMAN, JD
    GEOFORUM, 1989, 20 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [38] The evolution of soil conservation policies targeting land abandonment and soil erosion in Spain: A review
    van Leeuwen, Cynthia C. E.
    Cammeraat, Erik L. H.
    de Vente, Joris
    Boix-Fayos, Carolina
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 83 : 174 - 186
  • [39] Ecosystem services across borders: a framework for transboundary conservation policy
    Lopez-Hoffman, Laura
    Varady, Robert G.
    Flessa, Karl W.
    Balvanera, Patricia
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 8 (02) : 84 - 91
  • [40] Legitimacy of forest and nature conservation policy: A conceptual framework with illustrations
    Rantala, Tapio
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2012, 27 (02) : 164 - 176