SOYBEAN CULTIVAR RESPONSE TO PLANTING RATE AND TILLAGE

被引:14
|
作者
ELMORE, RW
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050011x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivar yield responses to tillage systems can vary in specific environments due to drought stress, diseases, or herbicides. In one of 3 yr in a previous study 'Mead' yielded 15% more in no-tillage than in tilled systems while 'Williams 82' yielded 8% less in no-tillage than in tilled systems. This was thought to be due to either a slight difference in plant populations between the two cultivars or genetic variability that could be used to develop tillage-specific cultivars. The study reported here was conducted to determine if planting rate of these two cultivars affected their responses to tillage. A 2-yr field study was conducted with two cultivars (Mead and Williams 82) at four planting rates (11.1, 34.6, 58.1, and 81.5 seeds m-2) and two tillage systems (no-tillage and triple disk). In 1986, the study was conducted on a Crete silt loam soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Pachic Argiustoll), which is moderately well drained with slow permeability. In 1987, the study was conducted on a Hastings silt loam soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Udic Argiustoll), which is well drained with moderately slow permeability. When averaged over planting rate, the cultivars responded similarly to tillage systems. Planting rate did not affect the responses of the cultivars to tillage system. Mead and Williams 82 appear to respond similarly to tillage systems in most environments regardless of planting rate.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 832
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CORN SOYBEAN ROTATION EFFECT AS INFLUENCED BY TILLAGE, NITROGEN, AND HYBRID CULTIVAR
    MEESE, BG
    CARTER, PR
    OPLINGER, ES
    PENDLETON, JW
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [32] Effect of tillage and cultivar on sudden death syndrome and yield of soybean in Iowa
    Kandel, Y. R.
    Leandro, L. F. S.
    Mueller, D. S.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 107 (12) : 5 - 5
  • [33] Effects of tillage, cultivar and fungicide on Phomopsis longicolla and Cercospora kukuchii in soybean
    Mengistu, Alemu
    Kelly, Heather M.
    Arelli, Prakash R.
    Bellaloui, Nacer
    CROP PROTECTION, 2015, 72 : 175 - 181
  • [34] SOYBEAN CULTIVAR HODGSON RESPONSE TO OZONE
    PRATT, GC
    KRUPA, SV
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (11) : 1129 - 1132
  • [35] RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN CULTIVAR HODGSON TO OZONE
    PRATT, GC
    KRUPA, SV
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (02) : 250 - 250
  • [36] Effect of Planting Date and Cultivar on Cereal Rye Development and Termination for Conservation Tillage Systems
    Nair, Ajay
    Neu, Kristine M.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (09) : S100 - S101
  • [37] Response of training system planting density and cultivar in pear
    Musacchi, S
    Ancarani, V
    Gamberini, A
    Gaddoni, M
    Grandi, M
    Sansavini, S
    Proceedings of the 9th International Pear Symposium, 2005, (671): : 463 - 469
  • [38] Tillage and nitrogen source and rate effects on corn response in corn-soybean rotation
    Kwaw-Mensah, David
    Al-Kaisi, Mahdi
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (03) : 507 - 513
  • [39] TILLAGE, ROW SPACING, AND PLANTING DATE EFFECTS ON SOYBEAN FOLLOWING CORN OR WHEAT
    LUESCHEN, WE
    FORD, JH
    EVANS, SD
    KANNE, BK
    HOVERSTAD, TR
    RANDALL, GW
    ORF, JH
    HICKS, DR
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1992, 5 (02): : 254 - 260
  • [40] A regression model to predict soybean cultivar yield performance at late planting dates
    Board, JE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (03) : 483 - 492