SOYBEAN CULTIVAR RESPONSE TO PLANTING RATE AND TILLAGE

被引:14
|
作者
ELMORE, RW
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050011x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivar yield responses to tillage systems can vary in specific environments due to drought stress, diseases, or herbicides. In one of 3 yr in a previous study 'Mead' yielded 15% more in no-tillage than in tilled systems while 'Williams 82' yielded 8% less in no-tillage than in tilled systems. This was thought to be due to either a slight difference in plant populations between the two cultivars or genetic variability that could be used to develop tillage-specific cultivars. The study reported here was conducted to determine if planting rate of these two cultivars affected their responses to tillage. A 2-yr field study was conducted with two cultivars (Mead and Williams 82) at four planting rates (11.1, 34.6, 58.1, and 81.5 seeds m-2) and two tillage systems (no-tillage and triple disk). In 1986, the study was conducted on a Crete silt loam soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Pachic Argiustoll), which is moderately well drained with slow permeability. In 1987, the study was conducted on a Hastings silt loam soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Udic Argiustoll), which is well drained with moderately slow permeability. When averaged over planting rate, the cultivars responded similarly to tillage systems. Planting rate did not affect the responses of the cultivars to tillage system. Mead and Williams 82 appear to respond similarly to tillage systems in most environments regardless of planting rate.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 832
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOYBEAN CULTIVAR RESPONSE TO TILLAGE SYSTEMS AND PLANTING DATE
    ELMORE, RW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [2] SOYBEAN RESPONSE TO TILLAGE AND PLANTING METHODS
    COLVIN, TS
    ERBACH, DC
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1982, 25 (06): : 1533 - &
  • [3] SOYBEAN CULTIVAR RESPONSE TO TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    ELMORE, RW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1987, 79 (01) : 114 - 119
  • [4] Soybean Cultivar Response to Planting Date and Seeding Rate under Organic Management
    Coulter, Jeffrey A.
    Sheaffer, Craig C.
    Haar, Milton J.
    Wyse, Donald L.
    Orf, James H.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (04) : 1223 - 1229
  • [5] Planting date, cultivar, and tillage system effects on dryland soybean production
    Popp, MP
    Keisling, TC
    McNew, RW
    Oliver, LR
    Dillon, CR
    Wallace, DM
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [6] SOYBEAN PLANTING DATE, ROW WIDTH, AND SEEDING RATE RESPONSE IN 3 TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    OPLINGER, ES
    PHILBROOK, BD
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1992, 5 (01): : 94 - 99
  • [7] Peanut Response to Planting Date, Tillage, and Cultivar in North Carolina
    Drake, W. L.
    Jordan, D. L.
    Johnson, P. D.
    Shew, B. B.
    Brandenburg, R. L.
    Corbett, T.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (02) : 486 - 490
  • [8] Soybean cultivar and planting date response to soil fumigation
    De Bruin, Jason L.
    Pedersen, Palle
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (04) : 965 - 970
  • [9] Effect of Cultivar and Planting Date on Soybean Response to Dicamba
    France, Wesley
    Norsworthy, Jason
    Roberts, Trent
    Ross, Jeremy
    Barber, Tom
    Gbur, Edward
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 2022
  • [10] Response of soybean sudden death syndrome to tillage and cultivar
    Vick, C. M.
    Bond, J. P.
    Chong, S. K.
    Russin, J. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2006, 28 (01) : 77 - 83