Managing Postoperative Infection following Breast Reconstruction with the Sientra AlloX2 Tissue Expander

被引:9
|
作者
Momeni, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Med Ctr, 770 Welch Rd,Suite 400, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000002046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive modality in the United States. Significant advances in surgical technique and technology have resulted in improvement of clinical outcomes. A recent innovation has been the introduction of a tissue expander with an integral drain that permits access to the periprosthetic space. A new use for this drain port is presented in patients with postoperative surgical-site infection. Methods: Patients who underwent staged implant-based breast reconstruction with the Sientra AlloX2 tissue expander and experienced postoperative infection that warranted inpatient management with intravenous antibiotics were included in the study. The integral drain port was used in these patients to perform washout of the periprosthetic space at the bedside. The ability to salvage the tissue expander in the setting of infection without the need for surgical revision in the operating room was determined. Results: Of 31 patients who underwent a total of 52 staged breast reconstructions with the Sientra AlloX2 tissue expander, 3 patients (8.7%) with a mean age of 50.3 years (range, 34-76 years) and mean body mass index of 23.3 kg/m(2) (range, 22.3-24.1 kg/ m(2)) met inclusion criteria. Salvage of the device with successful progression through expansion and eventual expander-implant exchange was achieved in 2 patients. One patient failed the salvage attempt and required removal of the device. Conclusion: Using the integral drain port of the AlloX2 tissue expander has the potential for device salvage in a subset of patients with surgical-site infection without the need for surgical revision.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tissue Expander versus Tissue Expander and Latissimus Flap in Morbidly Obese Breast Reconstruction Patients
    Luce, Edward A.
    Adams, Robert L.
    Chandler, Robert G.
    Parks, Joseph
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (03)
  • [22] THE USE OF AN INTEGRAL TISSUE EXPANDER FOR PRIMARY BREAST RECONSTRUCTION
    LAPIN, R
    ELLIOTT, M
    JURI, H
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 1985, 9 (03) : 221 - 226
  • [23] Breast Reconstruction: Complication Rate and Tissue Expander Type
    R. Yanko-Arzi
    M. J. Cohen
    R. Braunstein
    E. Kaliner
    R. Neuman
    M. Brezis
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2009, 33 : 489 - 496
  • [24] PRIMARY BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH A SUBPECTORAL SILICONE TISSUE EXPANDER
    PAUL, MD
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1985, 15 (05) : 404 - 414
  • [25] RIB FRACTURE AFTER BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH TISSUE EXPANDER
    Ahcan, Uros
    Zivec, Katarina
    ZDRAVNISKI VESTNIK-SLOVENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 78 (08): : 413 - 416
  • [26] A double pocket for tissue expander implantation in breast reconstruction
    Valdatta, L
    Mortarino, C
    Thione, A
    Buoro, M
    Fidanza, C
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 112 (07) : 1974 - 1975
  • [28] Effect of contralateral augmentation on postoperative complications after the second stage of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Kim, Suhwan
    Jeon, Byung-Joon
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    Bang, Sa Ik
    Pyon, Jai-Kyong
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (05) : 1182 - 1192
  • [29] Assessment of local tissue water in breasts following breast reconstruction with an expander prosthesis or DIEP flap
    Tallroth, Linda
    Brorson, Hakan
    Mobargha, Nathalie
    Velander, Patrik
    Klasson, Stina
    Becker, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2022, 56 (04) : 217 - 223
  • [30] Complication Rates of Radiation on Tissue Expander and Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction
    Tiffany Berry
    Suzanne Brooks
    Nicole Sydow
    Risal Djohan
    Benjamin Nutter
    Joanne Lyons
    Jill Dietz
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 17 : 202 - 210