Public Park and Recreation Managers' Experiences with Health Partnerships

被引:0
|
作者
Liechty, Toni [1 ]
Mowen, Andrew J. [2 ]
Payne, Laura L. [3 ]
Henderson, Karla A. [4 ]
Bocarro, Jason N. [4 ]
Bruton, Candice [4 ]
Godbey, Geoffrey C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, 289 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Recreat Pk & Tourism Management, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Recreat Sport & Tourism, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, Raleigh, NC USA
关键词
collaboration; health; management; partnerships; public parks and recreation; qualitative research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With many public health concerns on the rise (e.g., physical inactivity and chronic disease), public health organizations are seeking to increase effectiveness and efficiency through interdisciplinary partnerships. Some research has suggested that park and recreation agencies may be ideal partners for organizations trying to promote public health: however, research exploring such partnerships is limited. The purpose of this study was to explore experiences with health partnerships from the perspective of park and recreation managers. Data collection consisted of individual semi-structured interviews with 12 managers from different public park and recreation organizations who had experience with health partnerships. Data was digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. Participants described a partnership process that included exploring potential partners, planning the partnership, implementing the partnership activity(ies), and evaluation. During the exploration phase, the park and recreation organizations considered a wide range of partners and approached potential partners in a variety of ways including through informal relationships and through contacting people with whom no previous relationship existed. During the planning phase, managers negotiated the details of the partnership to ensure that the goals of the organizations aligned, to establish clear expectations, to determine leadership responsibilities, and to develop relationships. During the implementation phase, participants executed the partnership activity such as a program or event. Although some challenges were mitigated by planning, some arose during this phase such as lack of time or resources, perceived inequity of workloads, and waning enthusiasm. Finally, during the evaluation phase, managers appraised both the outcomes of the partnership activity(ies) and the partnership itself. Overall, participants suggested that in the current fiscal climate health partnerships represent a viable strategy for pooling resources to increase efficiency and expand services to the community. Their advice to managers seeking to develop health partnerships included the following: 1) do not be afraid to approach a wide variety of potential partners; 2) consider using partnerships for a wide variety of initiatives; 3) be prepared to convey the mutual benefits of the partnership including the contributions of park and recreation organizations such a facilities, programming expertise, positive public image, and community connections; 3) determine the mechanics of the partnership (such as leadership roles, input expectations, communication strategies, etc.) early on; and 4) consider utilizing the expertise of health partners to improve health outcome evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 27
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Introduction to the theme issues: "Recreation fees and pricing issues in the public sector" (Journal of Park and Recreation Administration) - "Societal response to recreation fees on public lands" (Journal of Leisure Research)
    Watson, AE
    JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1999, 31 (03) : 203 - 204
  • [32] Citizen Preferences for the Corporate Sponsorship of Public-Sector Park and Recreation Organizations
    Mowen, Andrew
    Kyle, Gerard
    Jackowski, Mick
    JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT & PUBLIC SECTOR MARKETING, 2007, 18 (02) : 93 - 118
  • [33] Physical Activity Promotion in North Carolina: Perceptions of Public Park and Recreation Directors
    Bocarro, Jason N.
    Casper, Jonathan
    Henderson, Karla A.
    Floyd, Myron F.
    Moore, Roger
    Kanters, Michael A.
    Laven, Kevin
    Edwards, Michael B.
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 27 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [34] Professional Certifications and Job Self-Efficacy of Public Park and Recreation Professionals
    Mulvaney, Michael A.
    Beggs, Brent A.
    Elkins, Daniel J.
    Hurd, Amy R.
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 33 (01) : 93 - 111
  • [35] Attitude Strength and Structure Regarding Privatization of Local Public Park and Recreation Services
    Pitas, Nicholas
    Mowen, Andrew J.
    Taff, Derrick
    Hickerson, Benjamin
    Radhakrishna, Rama
    Graefe, Alan
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 36 (03) : 141 - 159
  • [37] Public spaces for recreation in the Cinturao Verde city park of Cianorte Mandhuy Module
    Souza, Nadir Leandro
    Domingos De Angelis, Bruno Luiz
    REVISTA ACTA GEOGRAFICA, 2011, 5 (10): : 135 - 152
  • [38] Difficulties in the classification of public-private partnerships in public health
    de Almeida Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2017, 33
  • [39] Emergency Management Capacity Building: Park and Recreation Professionals as Volunteer Managers in Cross-systems Collaboration
    Drabczyk, Anne L.
    Schaumleffel, Nathan A.
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 24 (04) : 22 - 39
  • [40] Proceed with Caution: Public Perceptions Regarding Corporate Sponsorship of Park and Recreation Services
    Pitas, Nicholas A.
    Mowen, Andrew J.
    Liechty, Toni
    Trauntvein, Nate
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 33 (04) : 1 - 15