Requirement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head-and-neck cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy: An analysis of clinical and anatomic factors

被引:2
|
作者
Zauls, A. Jason [1 ]
Watkins, John M. [2 ]
Lucas, John [3 ]
Shirai, Keisuke [4 ]
Sharma, Anand K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Southcoast Canc Ctr, 363 Highland Ave, Fall River, MA 02720 USA
[2] Bismarck Canc Ctr, Bismarck, ND USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2012.06.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: There is significant variation in recommendation for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LAHNC), with some clinicians globally recommending prophylactic PEG and others waiting until toxicity has occurred. The present study was conceived to identify specific factors associated with PEG requirement, in a population of LAHNC patients who did not have up-front PEG placement. Methods and Materials: Using a quality assurance database, we identified patients with oropharyngeal (ORP) or laryngeal-hypopharyngeal (LHP) LAHNC who were treated with CRT for inclusion in a cohort study of factors impacting PEG placement. Eligibility included stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of ORP and LHP. Patients were excluded if they had a PEG placement prior to commencement of CRT. The primary endpoint compared across groups was PEG placement, and multivariate analysis of factors was performed. Results: We identified 107 patients with LAHNC who did not receive PEG tubes prior to treatment. After treatment initiation, 41% of patients with ORP tumors required PEG placement during treatment compared with 16% of LHP patients (P = .03). After adjusting for covariates, multivariate analysis revealed that the only predictor for PEG placement was ORP primary (odds ratio 4.77; 95% confidence interval 1.6-13.8, P =.009) using LHP as reference. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the patients with ORP cancers are more likely to require PEG placement during treatment and should be considered for prophylactic PEG placement, while LHP sites were associated with lower likelihood of PEG requirement. The primary reason for this difference appears to be severity of pharyngitis; proactive nutritional monitoring and supplementation should be implemented early. Patients with pretreatment risk stratification for PEG placement in LAHNC may improve quality of care and avoid unnecessary treatment breaks. (C) 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E61 / E69
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement Using a Balloon Catheter in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
    Fujita, Takeshi
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Kobayashi, Taiga
    Washida, Yasuo
    Kato, Masatoshi
    Iida, Etsushi
    Shimizu, Kensaku
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2013, 37 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [32] Use of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding Support in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Kasozi, R.
    Choudhary, A.
    Andrus, K.
    Wong, R.
    Randall, R.
    Orovets, C.
    Bali, G. S.
    Karapetyan, L.
    Gibson, M. K.
    Fu, P.
    Sloan, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (05): : 1401 - 1402
  • [33] Transcervical approach to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in a patient with head and neck cancer
    Shariff, Amir Hafeez
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Akhtar, Shabbir
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2014, 7 (03) : 256 - 259
  • [34] STOMAL SEEDING OF HEAD AND NECK-CANCER BY PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE
    STRODEL, WE
    KENADY, DE
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (05) : 462 - 463
  • [35] Survey of the experience of head and neck cancer patients with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.
    Sahu, Kamal Kant
    Gibbs, Lisa
    Siddiqui, Ahmad Daniyal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [36] The Experience of Head and Neck Cancer Patients With a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube at a Canadian Cancer Center
    Osborne, Joanna B.
    Collin, Laura A.
    Posluns, Elaine C.
    Stokes, Edith J.
    Vandenbussche, Katherine A.
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 27 (05) : 661 - 668
  • [37] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube in patients with radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: First results
    Anderhuber, W
    Walch, C
    Gotschuli, A
    Hinterleitner, T
    Pamper, I
    Lindschinger, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 : 862 - 862
  • [38] Usefulness of Prophylactic Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy
    Moleiro, Joana
    Faias, Sandra
    Fidalgo, Catarina
    Serrano, Miguel
    Dias Pereira, A.
    DYSPHAGIA, 2016, 31 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [39] Usefulness of Prophylactic Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy
    Joana Moleiro
    Sandra Faias
    Catarina Fidalgo
    Miguel Serrano
    A. Dias Pereira
    Dysphagia, 2016, 31 : 84 - 89
  • [40] Clinical Significance of Vulnerability Assessment in Patients with Primary Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy
    Chou, Wen-Chi
    Chang, Pei-Hung
    Chen, Ping-Tsung
    Wang, Hung-Ming
    Yeh, Kun-Yun
    Lu, Chang-Hsien
    Hung, Yu-Shin
    Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh
    Tsang, Ngan-Ming
    Ho, Ya-Wen
    Chen, Shih-Ying
    Lee, Shu-Hui
    Hung, Chia-Yen
    Wang, Li-Jen
    Liao, Kuo-Chen
    Lin, Chung-Hao
    Tang, Woung-Ru
    Lin, Yung-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : 602 - 611