Relationship Between Learner Autonomy and English Language Proficiency of Japanese Learners

被引:0
|
作者
Sakai, Shien [1 ]
Takagi, Akiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ Commerce, Dept Commerce, Chiba, Japan
[2] Osaka Kyoiku Univ, Dept English Educ, Osaka, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL | 2009年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
Learner autonomy; English as a foreign language; Questionnaire;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explores the relationship between learner autonomy and English language proficiency of Japanese university students from 16 universities. Questionnaires were administered to 721 students to clarify the perception they hold of their learning and learner autonomy. The students were divided into three levels of English proficiency, based on their score in a vocabulary test. The authors compared the subjects' differences in perceptions of learner autonomy among the three groups. The questionnaire was analyzed using factor analysis, and nine factors emerged. For future analysis, ANOVA and multiple comparisons, using Tukey HSD, were employed on three levels for those factors. Results show that there were differences in the degree of autonomy among the groups and revealed that good performers show attributes of "independent users", the middle group stayed at the range of "independent learners", and the poor performers were struggling at the "dependent learners" level. Based on these findings, the authors have summarized the characteristics present in the three levels of Japanese university students. This paper will present these findings and discuss the pedagogical implications of this study and how learner autonomy can be nurtured in each group.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 325
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unpacking the language demands in academic content and English language proficiency standards for English learners
    Wolf, Mikyung Kim
    Bailey, Alison L.
    Ballard, Laura
    Wang, Yuan
    Pogossian, Anahit
    INTERNATIONAL MULTILINGUAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01) : 68 - 85
  • [22] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT (EQ) AND THEIR LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY
    Hosseinpoor, Hamid
    Taghvaee, Mohammad
    Zangoei, Ali
    MODERN JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS, 2015, 5 (02): : 420 - 433
  • [23] Untangling the relationship between English as a foreign language learners' metacognitive experiences and writing proficiency: A mixed-methods approach
    Sun, Qiyu
    Pan, Haiying
    Zhan, Ju
    SYSTEM, 2023, 117
  • [24] English Proficiency of Japanese Third-Age Learners in the English Foreign Language Program: An Explanatory-Sequential Inquiry
    Jose, Dominic bryan s. san
    Guitche, Melona q.
    Madrigal, Dennis, V
    3L-LANGUAGE LINGUISTICS LITERATURE-THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2024, 30 (04): : 220 - 240
  • [25] The Relationship Between English Language Learner Status and Music Ensemble Participation
    Lorah, Julie A.
    Sanders, Elizabeth A.
    Morrison, Steven J.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MUSIC EDUCATION, 2014, 62 (03) : 234 - 244
  • [26] Learner Autonomy through Role Plays in English Language Teaching
    Baranovskaya, Tatiana
    Shaforostova, Valentina
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2018, 4 (04): : 8 - 19
  • [27] STARTALK eTower: An Effective OER to Promote Chinese Language Proficiency and Learner Autonomy
    Tan Dali
    Wu Lei
    Huang Rui
    Wang Zhen
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND CHINESE LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2022, 13 (01): : 74 - 100
  • [28] Malaysian Rural ESL Learners' Perceived English Language Proficiency
    Muhamad, Maizatulliza
    Seng, Goh Hock
    Khaja, Farah Natchiar Mohd
    Tahir, Mohd Haniff Mohd
    Saputra, Syahwil
    ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (02) : 274 - 287
  • [29] The Effects of Listening Comprehension on ESL Learners' English Language Proficiency
    Hong, Ho Sin
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF ELT RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (02): : 15 - +
  • [30] ENGLISH PROFICIENCY AND IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' MOTIVATION IN LANGUAGE INSTITUTES
    Behzadi, Anis
    Golshan, Mohammad
    MODERN JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS, 2015, 5 (04): : 162 - 168