Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term

被引:0
|
作者
Malik, Naushaba [1 ]
Shahzad, Sughra [1 ]
Malik, Shoaib Mansoor [1 ]
Anwar, Saima [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamabad & Holy Family Hosp, Social Secur Hosp, Dept Radiol, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
来源
RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2012年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Estimated fetal weight (EFW); fetal weight; sonographic estimation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the sensitivity and specificity of clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight at term in pregnant ladies. Methods This validation study was conducted in Social Security Hospital Islamabad during January 2009 to December 2010. All cases coming for deliveries in hospital were included in the study. Pregnant ladies had estimation of fetal weight both clinically and ultrasonically at term and validated by actual birth weight of fetus after delivery. Results that actual birth weight was also not significantly less than clinically estimated weight. The mean of clinically calculated weight of fetus was 2998.20g +/- 525.8g. The t value was - 0.954 and p value was 0.343. Conclusion Clinical estimation of fetal weight is as accurate as sonographic estimation and also good enough for screening of the birth weight from its high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Thus, it is not necessary to evaluate every pregnant lady for antenatal fetal weight by ultrasound.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer, J.
    Peter, W.
    Zollver, H.
    Hart, N.
    Mueller, A.
    Meurer, B.
    Goecke, T.
    Schild, R. L.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2008, 29 (04): : 377 - 382
  • [32] Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies
    Colman, Atalie
    Maharaj, Dushyant
    Hutton, John
    Tuohy, Jeremy
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 119 (1241)
  • [33] Sonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight in Obese Women at Term.
    Carroll, Lisa M.
    Johnston, Robert
    Bosse, Bradley
    Chung, Judith
    Chan, Kenneth
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 26 : 228A - 228A
  • [34] Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight at term: An evaluation of eight formulae
    Mirghani, HM
    Weerasinghe, S
    Ezimokhai, M
    Smith, JR
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2005, 31 (05) : 409 - 413
  • [35] Source term estimation using an adjoint model: a comparison of two different algorithms
    Tinarelli, Gianni
    Uboldi, Francesco
    Carlino, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2018, 64 (1-3) : 209 - 229
  • [36] Comparison of two channel estimation methods
    Zhang, QR
    Li, DB
    2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 521 - 524
  • [37] The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review
    Milner, Julia
    Arezina, Jane
    ULTRASOUND, 2018, 26 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [38] ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT
    HIGGINBOTTOM, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1978, 51 (603): : 232 - 232
  • [39] Comparison of Formulas for Estimation of Fetal Weight in Pregnancies Complicated by Gastroschisis
    Tonismae, Tiffany
    Voirol, Jenna
    Schubert, Frank
    Shanks, Anthony
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 182S - 182S
  • [40] COMPARISON OF FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION FORMULAS WITH AND WITHOUT HEAD MEASUREMENTS
    WARSOF, SL
    WOLF, P
    COULEHAN, J
    QUEENAN, JT
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (04): : 569 - 573