Results of Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Yoon, Mee Sun [1 ]
Nam, Taek-Keun [1 ]
Kim, Hyeong-Rok [2 ]
Nah, Byung-Sik [1 ]
Chung, Woong-Ki [1 ]
Kim, Young-Jin [2 ]
Ahn, Sung-Ja [1 ]
Song, Ju-Young [1 ]
Jeong, Jae-Uk [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL | 2008年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Preoperative chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.247
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate anal sphincter preservation rates, survival rates, and prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty patients with pathologic confirmed rectal cancer and treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy between January 1999 and June 2007. Of the 150 patients, the 82 who completed the scheduled chemoradiotherapy, received definitive surgery at our hospital, and did not have distant metastasis upon initial diagnosis were enrolled in this study. The radiation dose delivered to the whole pelvis ranged from 41.4 to 46.0 Gy (median 44.0 Gy) using daily fractions of 1.8 similar to 2.0 Gy at 5 days per week and a boost dose to the primary tumor and high risk area up to a total of 43.2 similar to 54 Gy (median 50.4 Gy). Sixty patients (80.5%) received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin, while 16 patients (19.5%) were administered 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 4 weeks concurrently during radiotherapy. Surgery was performed for 3 to 45 weeks (median 7 weeks) after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Results: The sphincter preservation rates for all patients were 73.2% (60/82). Of the 48 patients whose tumor was located at less than 5 cm away from the anal verge, 31 (64.6%) underwent sphincter-saving surgery. Moreover, of the 34 patients whose tumor was located at greater than or equal to 5 cm away from the anal verge, 29 (85.3%) were able to preserve their anal sphincter. A pathologic complete response was achieved in 14.6% (12/82) of all patients. The downstaging rates were 42.7% (35/82) for the T stage, 75.5% (37/49) for the N stage, and 67.1% (55/82) for the overall stages. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range 11 similar to 107 months). The overall 5-year survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control rates were 67.4%, 58.9% and 84.4%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates based on the pathologic stage were 100% for stage 0 (n=12), 59.1 % for stage I (n=16), 78.6% for stage II (n=30), 36.9% for stage III (n=23), and one patient with pathologic stage IV was alive for 43 months (p=0.02). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 77.8% for stage 0, 63.6 % for stage I, 58.9% for stage II, 51.1% for stage III, and 0% for stage IV (p<0.001). The 5-year locoregional control rates were 88.9% for stage 0, 93.8% for stage I, 91.1% for stage II, 68.2% for stage III, and one patient with pathologic stage IV was alive without local recurrence (p=0.01). The results of a multivariate analysis with age (<= 55 vs. >55), clinical stage (I+II vs. III), radiotherapy to surgery interval (<= 6 weeks vs. >6 weeks), operation type (sphincter preservation vs. no preservation), pathologic T stage, pathologic N stage, pathologic overall stage (0 vs. I+II vs. III+IV), and pathologic response (complete vs. non-CR), only age and pathologic N stage were significant predictors of overall survival, pathologic overall stage for disease-free survival, and pathologic N stage for locoregional control rates, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 25 patients (local recurrence in 10 patients, distant metastasis in 13 patients, and both in 2 patients). Acute hematologic toxicity (>= grade 3) during chemoradiotherapy was observed in 2 patients, while skin toxicity was observed in 1 patient. Complications developing within 60 days after surgery and required admission or surgical intervention, were observed in 11 patients: anastomotic leakage in 5 patients, pelvic abscess in 2 patients, and others in 4 patients. Conclusion: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was an effective modality to achieve downstaging and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer cases with a relatively low toxicity. Pathologic N stage was a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival and locoregional control and so, more intensified postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Ronzoni, M.
    Vitali, G.
    Tamburini, A. M.
    Staudacher, C.
    Villa, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 : 44 - 44
  • [22] Analysis of influencing factors of no/low response to preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Wu, Fengpeng
    Wang, Guiying
    Wang, Jun
    Zhou, Chaoxi
    Yang, Congrong
    Niu, Wenbo
    Zhang, Jianfeng
    Wang, Guanglin
    Yang, Yafan
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [23] HIF-1α Expression Increases Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Resistance in Hyperglycemic Rectal Cancer
    Huang, Yi-Jung
    Chen, Yi-Ting
    Huang, Chun-Ming
    Kuo, Shih-Hsun
    Liao, Yan-You
    Jhang, Wun-Ya
    Wang, Shuo-Hung
    Ke, Chien-Chih
    Huang, Yu-Hsiang
    Cheng, Chiu-Min
    Huang, Ming-Yii
    Chuang, Chih-Hung
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [24] Ongoing evolution of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Soudy, Hussein
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (1-2) : 8 - 9
  • [25] Comparison of treatment results between surgery alone, preoperative short-course radiotherapy, or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Chung-Hung Yeh
    Miao-Fen Chen
    Chia-Hsuan Lai
    Wen-Shih Huang
    Steve P. Lee
    Wen-Cheng Chen
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012, 17 : 482 - 490
  • [26] Comparison of treatment results between surgery alone, preoperative short-course radiotherapy, or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yeh, Chung-Hung
    Chen, Miao-Fen
    Lai, Chia-Hsuan
    Huang, Wen-Shih
    Lee, Steve P.
    Chen, Wen-Cheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 17 (05) : 482 - 490
  • [27] Impact of preoperative transcatheter rectal arterial chemoembolization with concurrent chemoradiotherapy on surgery and prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Meng, Wenjun
    Yang, Bo
    Huang, Bin
    Chen, Chuan
    Zhu, Jianwu
    Jian, Dan
    Zhong, Li
    Wang, Dong
    Li, Chunxue
    Bai, Lian
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 124 (08) : 1451 - 1458
  • [28] Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer
    Santiago, RJ
    Metz, JM
    Hanh, S
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 16 (04) : 995 - +
  • [29] Early Systemic Failure After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Rectal Cancer
    Choi, Taesun
    Baek, Se-Jin
    Kwak, Jung Myun
    Kim, Jin
    Kim, Seon-Hahn
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (02) : 94 - 99
  • [30] Differential effect of concurrent chemotherapy regimen on clinical outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Kim, Eunji
    Kim, Kyubo
    Oh, Do Hoon
    Han, Sae-Won
    Kim, Tae-You
    Jung, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    Kang, Gyeong Hoon
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (02): : 470 - 478