CORONARY-BYPASS GRAFTING IN THE ELDERLY - SINGLE VERSUS BILATERAL INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY GRAFTS

被引:50
|
作者
GALBUT, DL [1 ]
TRAAD, EA [1 ]
DORMAN, MJ [1 ]
DEWITT, PL [1 ]
LARSEN, PB [1 ]
KURLANSKY, PA [1 ]
CARRILLO, RG [1 ]
GENTSCH, TO [1 ]
EBRA, G [1 ]
机构
[1] MIAMI HEART INST,MIAMI BEACH,FL 33140
来源
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 1993年 / 106卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5223(19)33749-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A surgical experience between October 1983 and December 1990, with 1467 consecutive patients 65 years of age and over, was used to compare patients receiving single internal mammary artery grafts (n = 736) with those receiving bilateral internal mammary artery grafts (n = 731). The mean age in the single-graft group was 73.2 years and 70.9 years in the bilateral-graft group (p < 0.001). Various clinical parameters were analyzed that revealed that the single-graft group had more women and more patients with unstable angina, a history of previous myocardial infarction, and emergency surgery (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, triple vessel coronary artery disease, left main coronary artery stenosis, or left ventricular function between the two groups. Hospital mortality for the single-graft group was 6.4% (47 patients) and 3.1% (23 patients) for the bilateral-graft group (p < 0.004). No significant difference was observed between the groups in the rate of reoperation for bleeding, sternal infection, respiratory failure, stroke, or perioperative infarction. Follow-up was obtained in 663 hospital survivors (96.4%) in the single-graft group and in 691 (97.7%) in the bilateral-graft group. Mean follow-up in the single-graft group was 42.5 months (range, 1 to 92.4 months) and 43.0 months (range, 1 to 90.3 months) in the bilateral-graft group. In the single-graft group, survival was 60.7% +/- 4.8% (+/-standard error of the mean ) at 8 years (60 patients at risk); it was 67.9% +/- 8.1% (18 patients at risk) for the bilateral-graft group (p < 0.028). This comparative study demonstrates that bilateral internal mammary artery grafting can be accomplished in elderly patients with low operative risk and hospital morbidity. Moreover, patients in both groups had a reduction in cardiac events and significant functional improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 136
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Left or bilateral internal mammary artery employment in coronary artery bypass grafting: midterm results
    Fomenko, Mikhail Sergeevich
    Schneider, Yuri Alexandrovich
    Tsoi, Victor Gennadievich
    Pavlov, Alexander Anatolyevich
    Shilenko, Pavel Alexandrovich
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2021, 29 (08): : 758 - 762
  • [42] Survival after bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: Are women at risk?
    Saraiva, Francisca A.
    Girerd, Nicolas
    Cerqueira, Rui J.
    Ferreira, Joao Pedro
    Vilas-Boas, Noelia
    Pinho, Paulo
    Barros, Antonio
    Amorim, Mario J.
    Lourenco, Andre P.
    Leite-Moreira, Adelino F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 270 : 89 - 95
  • [43] Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass: 15-year followup
    Burfeind, WR
    Rankin, JS
    Tuttle, RH
    Wechsler, AS
    Shaw, LK
    Glower, DGD
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 588 - 588
  • [44] Propensity-matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery vs single internal mammary artery in 7702 cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting
    Saito, Aya
    Miyata, Hiroaki
    Motomura, Noboru
    Ono, Minoru
    Takamoto, Shinichi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 44 (04) : 711 - 717
  • [45] Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in the Elderly: Long-Term Survival Benefit
    Kurlansky, Paul A.
    Traad, Ernest A.
    Dorman, Malcolm J.
    Galbut, David L.
    Ebra, George
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 100 (04): : 1374 - 1382
  • [46] BILATERAL INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY GRAFTING FOR AORTO-CORONARY BYPASS-SURGERY - ASSOCIATION WITH GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY GRAFTS IN 2 CASES
    ACAR, C
    MABESOONE, F
    BORS, V
    PAVIE, A
    GANDJBAKHCH, I
    CABROL, C
    ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX, 1989, 82 (12): : 2021 - 2024
  • [47] Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mamma Artery Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Matched Analysis
    Zhu, Ying Yan
    Seco, Michael
    Harris, Stella R.
    Koullouros, Michalis
    Ramponi, Fabio
    Wilson, Michael
    Bannon, Paul G.
    Vallely, Michael P.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (05): : 807 - 813
  • [48] Commentary: Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Arteries in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-Is There a Sweet Spot?
    Rushani, Dinela
    Tam, Derrick Y.
    Fremes, Stephen E.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 33 (02) : 393 - 394
  • [49] THE LEFT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY - A CHOICE GRAFT FOR CORONARY-BYPASS
    CRON, JP
    ADOLPH, WL
    ALFANDARI, JP
    BAUD, F
    BEUZELIN, JP
    BONNEMAZOU, A
    GEPNER, J
    NIGOT, G
    PIROELLE, Y
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1987, 16 (09): : 427 - 430
  • [50] Quality of life in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic artery versus single internal thoracic artery
    Zebalski, Marcin
    Bis, Jaroslaw
    Krejca, Michal
    Deja, Marek A.
    KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 17 (01) : 24 - 28