Comparison of Online Survey Recruitment Platforms for Hard-to-Reach Pregnant Smoking Populations: Feasibility Study

被引:61
|
作者
Ibarra, Jose Luis [1 ]
Agas, Jessica Marie [1 ]
Lee, Melissa [1 ]
Pan, Julia Lily [1 ]
Buttenheim, Alison Meredith [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Family & Community Hlth, Fagin Hall,4th Fl,418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2018年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
socioeconomic status; smoking; nicotine; cognitive bias; Web-based methods; crowdsourcing; delay discounting; vulnerable populations;
D O I
10.2196/resprot.8071
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recruiting hard-to-reach populations for health research is challenging. Web-based platforms offer one way to recruit specific samples for research purposes, but little is known about the feasibility of online recruitment and the representativeness and comparability of samples recruited through different Web-based platforms. Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of recruiting a hard-to-reach population (pregnant smokers) using 4 different Web based platforms and to compare participants recruited through each platform. Methods: A screener and survey were distributed online through Qualtrics Panel, Soapbox Sample, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results of each recruitment platform, including eligibility yield, quality yield, income, race, age, and gestational age. Results: Of the 3847 participants screened for eligibility across all 4 Web-based platforms, 535 were eligible and 308 completed the survey Amazon mTurk yielded the fewest completed responses (n=9), 100% (9/9) of which passed several quality metrics verifying pregnancy and smoking status. Qualtrics Panel yielded 14 completed responses, 86% (12/14) of which passed the quality screening. Soapbox Sample produced 107 completed surveys, 67% (72/107) of which were found to be quality responses. Advertising through Reddit produced the highest completion rate (n=178), but only 29.2% (52/178) of those surveys passed the quality metrics. We found significant differences in eligibility yield, quality yield, age, number of previous pregnancies, age of smoking initiation, current smokers, race, education, and income (P<.001). Conclusions: Although each platform successfully recruited pregnant smokers, results varied in quality, cost, and percentage of complete responses. Moving forward, investigators should pay careful attention to the percentage yield and cost of online recruitment platforms to maximize internal and external validity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health-Related Internet Use in Hard-to-Reach Populations: Empirical Findings From a Survey in a Remote and Mountainous Province in China
    Li, HongMin
    Xu, Jin
    Li, Lingui
    Meng, Qingyue
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05)
  • [32] Conducting Health Literacy Research With Hard-to-Reach Regional Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations: Evaluation Study of Recruitment and Retention Methods Before and During COVID-19
    Perrins, Genevieve
    Ferdous, Tabassum
    Hay, Dawn
    Harreveld, Bobby
    Reid-Searl, Kerry
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (11)
  • [33] Are hard-to-reach populations being reached with immunization services? Findings from the 2005 Papua New Guinea national immunization coverage survey
    Toikilik, Steven
    Tuges, George
    Lagani, Jamie
    Wafiware, Elis
    Posanai, Enoch
    Coghlan, Ben
    Morgan, Christopher
    Sweeney, Rohan
    Miller, Nan
    Abramov, Anatoly
    Stewart, Anthony
    Clements, C. John
    VACCINE, 2010, 28 (29) : 4673 - 4679
  • [34] PHOTOGRAPHIC FOOD DIARIES FOR NUTRITIONAL RESEARCH WITH CHILDREN AND HARD-TO-REACH POPULATIONS: A CASE STUDY EXPLORATION OF A NOVEL ASSESSMENT TOOL
    McClure, Brockfeld E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S417 - S417
  • [35] CHECK IT! A SEEK, TEST AND TREAT PILOT STUDY OF METHODS FOR COMMUNITY RECRUITMENT OF HARD-TO-REACH MEN FOR CHLAMYDIA AND GONORRHEA SCREENING AND EXPEDITED TREATMENT
    Kissinger, Patricia
    White, Scott A.
    Schmidt, Norine
    Serrano, Jose
    Thomas, Kendall
    Saleem, Nkenge
    Carter, Nicole
    Vosteen, Vanessa
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2014, 41 : S13 - S13
  • [36] Involving hard-to-reach populations is pivotal for the tailoring and implementation of an epidemiological study in cross-border communities of French Guiana and Suriname
    Schaub, Roxane
    Ottevanger, M. Sigrid Mac Donald
    Harkisoen, Soeradj
    Pesna, Beatrice
    Duijves, Celine
    Heemskerk, Marieke
    Polime, Thomas
    Tuaillon, Edouard
    Vreden, Stephen
    Nacher, Mathieu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [37] Using peer advocates to improve access to services among hard-to-reach populations with hepatitis C: a qualitative study of client and provider relationships
    Jennifer MacLellan
    Julian Surey
    Ibrahim Abubakar
    Helen R. Stagg
    Jenevieve Mannell
    Harm Reduction Journal, 14
  • [38] Using peer advocates to improve access to services among hard-to-reach populations with hepatitis C: a qualitative study of client and provider relationships
    MacLellan, Jennifer
    Surey, Julian
    Abubakar, Ibrahim
    Stagg, Helen R.
    Mannell, Jenevieve
    HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2017, 14
  • [39] Diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of HIV oral fluid rapid tests among hard-to-reach key populations in Latvia, the country with highest infection rates in Europe
    Kivite, A.
    Kaupe, R.
    Linina, I.
    Upmace, I.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2018, 21 : 171 - 171
  • [40] Digital Interventions through an online community portal to engage historically hard-to-reach populations of same-sex attracted men living in a heterosexual relationship or lifestyle
    Hawk, C.
    Ruth, S.
    Batrouney, C.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2022, 25 : 155 - 155