Comparison of Online Survey Recruitment Platforms for Hard-to-Reach Pregnant Smoking Populations: Feasibility Study

被引:61
|
作者
Ibarra, Jose Luis [1 ]
Agas, Jessica Marie [1 ]
Lee, Melissa [1 ]
Pan, Julia Lily [1 ]
Buttenheim, Alison Meredith [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Family & Community Hlth, Fagin Hall,4th Fl,418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2018年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
socioeconomic status; smoking; nicotine; cognitive bias; Web-based methods; crowdsourcing; delay discounting; vulnerable populations;
D O I
10.2196/resprot.8071
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recruiting hard-to-reach populations for health research is challenging. Web-based platforms offer one way to recruit specific samples for research purposes, but little is known about the feasibility of online recruitment and the representativeness and comparability of samples recruited through different Web-based platforms. Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of recruiting a hard-to-reach population (pregnant smokers) using 4 different Web based platforms and to compare participants recruited through each platform. Methods: A screener and survey were distributed online through Qualtrics Panel, Soapbox Sample, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results of each recruitment platform, including eligibility yield, quality yield, income, race, age, and gestational age. Results: Of the 3847 participants screened for eligibility across all 4 Web-based platforms, 535 were eligible and 308 completed the survey Amazon mTurk yielded the fewest completed responses (n=9), 100% (9/9) of which passed several quality metrics verifying pregnancy and smoking status. Qualtrics Panel yielded 14 completed responses, 86% (12/14) of which passed the quality screening. Soapbox Sample produced 107 completed surveys, 67% (72/107) of which were found to be quality responses. Advertising through Reddit produced the highest completion rate (n=178), but only 29.2% (52/178) of those surveys passed the quality metrics. We found significant differences in eligibility yield, quality yield, age, number of previous pregnancies, age of smoking initiation, current smokers, race, education, and income (P<.001). Conclusions: Although each platform successfully recruited pregnant smokers, results varied in quality, cost, and percentage of complete responses. Moving forward, investigators should pay careful attention to the percentage yield and cost of online recruitment platforms to maximize internal and external validity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reaching Hard-To-Reach Populations: an Analysis of Survey Recruitment Methods
    Xu, Xuecong
    Yan, Xiang
    Dillahunt, Tawanna R.
    CONFERENCE COMPANION PUBLICATION OF THE 2019 COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW'19 COMPANION), 2019, : 428 - 432
  • [2] Social Media Recruitment of Marginalized, Hard-to-Reach Populations: Development of Recruitment and Monitoring Guidelines
    Russomanno, Jennifer
    Patterson, Joanne G.
    Tree, Jennifer M. Jabson
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2019, 5 (04): : 31 - 43
  • [3] Formative Research on MySpace: Online Methods to Engage Hard-to-Reach Populations
    Levine, Deborah
    Madsen, Allegra
    Wright, Erin
    Barar, Rana E.
    Santelli, John
    Bull, Sheana
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 16 (04) : 448 - 454
  • [4] Precarious work and methodological challenges to study hard-to-reach populations
    Fernandes, Rita de Cassia P.
    de Siqueira, Janaina Santos
    dos Santos, Matheus F.
    Pena, Paulo G. L.
    Werneck, Guilherme L.
    Burdorf, Alex
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2024, 58
  • [5] Optimizing Social Media as a Recruitment Tool for Hard-to-Reach Populations in Rheumatology Clinical Research
    Tsaltskan, Vladislav
    Nguyen, Katherine
    Eaglin, Christina
    Deane, Kevin
    Holers, V. Michael
    Firestein, Gary
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 73 : 452 - 453
  • [6] MAXIMIZING SURVEY RESPONSE RATES FOR HARD-TO-REACH INNER-CITY POPULATIONS
    POTTICK, KJ
    LERMAN, P
    SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 72 (01) : 172 - 180
  • [7] Recruitment and Attrition for Panel Surveys of Hard-to-reach Populations: Some Lessons from a Longitudinal Study on Undocumented Migrants
    Duvoisin, Aline
    Refle, Jan-Erik
    Burton-Jeangros, Claudine
    Consoli, Liala
    Fakhoury, Julien
    Jackson, Yves
    FIELD METHODS, 2024, 36 (04) : 294 - 310
  • [8] Transformative transportation survey methods: Enhancing household transportation survey methods for hard-to-reach populations
    Lubitow, Amy
    Lievanos, Raoul S.
    Carpenter, Erika
    McGee, Julius Alexander
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 98
  • [9] Comparison of Web-Based Advertising and a Social Media Platform as Recruitment Tools for Underserved and Hard-to-Reach Populations in Rheumatology Clinical Research
    Tsaltskan, Vladislav
    Nguyen, Katherine
    Eaglin, Christina
    Holers, V. Michael
    Deane, Kevin D.
    Firestein, Gary S.
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 4 (07) : 623 - 630
  • [10] Social Media Recruitment and Online Data Collection: A Beginner's Guide and Best Practices for Accessing Low-Prevalence and Hard-to-Reach Populations
    King, David B.
    O'Rourke, Norm
    DeLongis, Anita
    CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2014, 55 (04): : 240 - 249