Evaluation of recent global geopotential models by GNSS/levelling data: Internal Aegean region

被引:13
|
作者
Yilmaz, M. [1 ]
Turgut, B. [1 ]
Gullu, M. [1 ]
Yilmaz, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-03200 Afyon, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCES | 2016年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Geoid; Geopotential model; GNSS/levelling;
D O I
10.26833/ijeg.285221
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Global geopotential models of spherical harmonic coefficients are used to determine the external gravitational field of the Earth. These coefficients are derived from satellite orbit perturbations, terrestrial gravity anomalies and altimeter data. Hundreds of thousands of coefficients and standard deviation values for these coefficients are estimated from millions of observation. Measurement amount, homogenous distribution of the measurements of global scale, different measurement types reflecting the different frequencies of the gravity signal and measuring-assessment techniques affect the model accuracy directly. Starting from 1960's and lasts to the present day and also gaining new acceleration with the satellite gravity field missions, every outcome of the studies related to the determination of the global Geopotential model is experienced by a series of validation tests. Accuracy of the model can either be determined from the estimated error degree variances concerning the coefficients (interior validation) or comparison of geoid heights, gravity anomalies, gravity disturbances and components of vertical deflection calculated from the model with terrestrial measurements directly (outer validation). In this paper, recent global geopotential models are primarily explained. Global geopotential models are compared with GNSS/levelling data of the study area. The objective of this comparison is to determine the best fit global geopotential model which will contribute to the study of Turkish geoid determination.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance evaluation of high/ultra-high-degree global geopotential models over Vietnam using GNSS/leveling data
    Pham, Hoa Thi
    Claessens, Sten
    Kuhn, Michael
    Awange, Joseph
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2023, 14 (05) : 500 - 512
  • [22] Performance evaluation of high/ultra-high-degree global geopotential models over Vietnam using GNSS/leveling data
    Hoa Thi Pham
    Sten Claessens
    Michael Kuhn
    Joseph Awange
    Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2023, 14 (05) : 500 - 512
  • [23] An evaluation of recent GOCE geopotential models in Brazil
    Guimaraes, G. N.
    Matos, A. C. O. C.
    Blitzkow, D.
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2012, 2 (02) : 144 - 155
  • [24] Assessment of latest global gravity field models by GNSS/Levelling Geoid
    Yilmaz, Nazan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCES, 2023, 8 (02): : 111 - 118
  • [25] EVALUATION AND COMPARISION RECENT GLOBAL GEOPOTENTIAL MODEL IN SERBIA
    Odalovic, Oleg
    Grekulovic, Sanja
    Vasiljevic, Ivana
    GEOCONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, GEOINFORMATICS AND REMOTE SENSING - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL II, 2013, : 175 - +
  • [26] Global geopotential models evaluation based on terrestrial gravity data over Ethiopia
    Alemu, Eyasu
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEODESY, 2023, 17 (03) : 217 - 235
  • [27] QUALITY ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS AT 1542 GPS/LEVELLING BENCHMARKS OVER THE HELLENIC MAINLAND
    Kotsakis, C.
    Katsambalos, K.
    SURVEY REVIEW, 2010, 42 (318) : 327 - 344
  • [28] Analysis of Recent Global Geopotential Models Over the Croatian Territory
    Liker, M.
    Lucic, M.
    Barisic, B.
    Repanic, M.
    Grgic, I.
    Basic, T.
    GRAVITY, GEOID AND EARTH OBSERVATION, 2010, 135 : 283 - 288
  • [29] Evaluation of Global Geopotential Models for the States of Maranhao and Piaui
    De Sampaio Melo, Lineardo Ferreira
    Correia De Freitas, Silvio Rogerio
    BOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS, 2012, 18 (02): : 203 - 224
  • [30] Evaluation of global geopotential models: a case study for India
    Goyal, Ropesh
    Dikshit, Onkar
    Balasubramania, Nagarajan
    SURVEY REVIEW, 2019, 51 (368) : 402 - 412