The Rise of Accelerated Seasoned Equity Underwritings

被引:41
|
作者
Bortolotti, Bernardo [1 ,4 ]
Megginson, William [2 ,5 ]
Smart, Scott B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Finance, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Michael Price Coll Business, Finance, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Whirlpool Finance Fac, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] FEEM, Milan, MI, Italy
[5] Univ Paris 09, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6622.2008.00192.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) executed through accelerated underwritings have recently seen significant increases in global market share, and now account for a majority of the proceeds from both U. S. and European SEOs. Based on their study of over 30,000 global SEOs during the period 1991-2004, the authors conclude that accelerated offerings occur more rapidly (as their name suggests), raise more capital, and require fewer underwriters than conventional fully marketed SEOs. Accelerated transactions also typically involve larger, better-known companies that tend to be selling substantial amounts of secondary as well as primary secondary shares (whereas traditional SEOs consist almost entirely of primary shares). Besides speed of execution, the growing popularity of accelerated deals is also attributed to lower spreads, the reduced price risk for issuers resulting from thebrief underwriting period, and "marketimpact"costs that are no larger than those that accompany traditional SEOs. Indeed, according to the authors' estimates, accelerated deals reduce the total issuance costs of U. S. issuers-in the form of lower spreads, market-impact costs, and underpricing-by 250 basis points, on average, while the cost reduction for European sellers is said to be close to 400 basis points. The authors also present an analysis of SEO investment banking syndicates that illustrates that accelerated deals yield much smaller, more capital-intensive, and presumably riskier underwriting syndicates that generate comparable revenues over much shorter transactions periods. In so doing, they enable larger, more reputable banks to "buy"market share and league table rankings. The authors' findings underscore three major trends that are shaping global investment banking. First, the fact that accelerated deals are marketed almost exclusively to institutional investors, and that these underwriting methods are gaining market share, suggests the declining importance of retail investors in equity markets everywhere. Second, the rise of accelerated deals both promotes and reflects increasing concentration in the investment banking industry, since only the largest banks have the capital base and risk tolerance required to buy large share blocks outright and assume all or most of the price risk of later resale. Finally, the increasing use of accelerated underwritings for SEOs provides another case of the "commoditization"of financial transactions characterized by relatively low asymmetric information. Since ATs can be employed for shares of only large and well-known companies, these offerings are executed very quickly and cheaply-in much the same way plain vanilla corporate bonds are sold-and with minimal need for the placement and marketing services that investment banks use for IPOs and other non-transparent security offerings.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / +
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Policy uncertainty and seasoned equity offerings methods
    Dang, Man
    Puwanenthiren, Premkanth
    Hong An Thai
    Mazur, Mieszko
    Jones, Edward
    Xuan Vinh Vo
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 77
  • [32] The role of institutional investors in seasoned equity offerings
    Chemmanur, Thomas J.
    He, Shan
    Hu, Gang
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 94 (03) : 384 - 411
  • [33] The rise of UK Seasoned Equity Offerings (SEOs) fees during the financial crisis: The role of institutional shareholders and underwriters
    Levis, Mario
    Meoli, Michele
    Migliorati, Katrin
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 48 : 13 - 28
  • [34] Seasoned Equity Selling Mechanisms: Costs and Innovations
    Dai, Na
    Chen, Hsuan-Chi
    JOURNAL OF PRIVATE EQUITY, 2008, 11 (03): : 16 - 29
  • [35] The impact of regulation on the seasoned equity offering decision
    Melia, Adrian
    Docherty, Paul
    Easton, Steve
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 45 (01) : 94 - 113
  • [36] TRADING AND MANIPULATION AROUND SEASONED EQUITY OFFERINGS
    GERARD, B
    NANDA, V
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1993, 48 (01): : 213 - 245
  • [37] Cost asymmetry around seasoned equity offerings
    D' Costa, Mabel
    Opare, Solomon
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2022, 34
  • [38] Seasoned Equity Offerings, Corporate Governance, and Investments
    Kim, E. Han
    Purnanandam, Amiyatosh
    REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2014, 18 (03) : 1023 - 1057
  • [39] Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings
    Rangan, S
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 50 (01) : 101 - 122
  • [40] Understanding seasoned equity offerings of Chinese firms
    Bo, Hong
    Huang, Zhongnan
    Wang, Changyun
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (05) : 1143 - 1157