The Rise of Accelerated Seasoned Equity Underwritings

被引:41
|
作者
Bortolotti, Bernardo [1 ,4 ]
Megginson, William [2 ,5 ]
Smart, Scott B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Finance, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Michael Price Coll Business, Finance, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Whirlpool Finance Fac, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] FEEM, Milan, MI, Italy
[5] Univ Paris 09, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6622.2008.00192.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) executed through accelerated underwritings have recently seen significant increases in global market share, and now account for a majority of the proceeds from both U. S. and European SEOs. Based on their study of over 30,000 global SEOs during the period 1991-2004, the authors conclude that accelerated offerings occur more rapidly (as their name suggests), raise more capital, and require fewer underwriters than conventional fully marketed SEOs. Accelerated transactions also typically involve larger, better-known companies that tend to be selling substantial amounts of secondary as well as primary secondary shares (whereas traditional SEOs consist almost entirely of primary shares). Besides speed of execution, the growing popularity of accelerated deals is also attributed to lower spreads, the reduced price risk for issuers resulting from thebrief underwriting period, and "marketimpact"costs that are no larger than those that accompany traditional SEOs. Indeed, according to the authors' estimates, accelerated deals reduce the total issuance costs of U. S. issuers-in the form of lower spreads, market-impact costs, and underpricing-by 250 basis points, on average, while the cost reduction for European sellers is said to be close to 400 basis points. The authors also present an analysis of SEO investment banking syndicates that illustrates that accelerated deals yield much smaller, more capital-intensive, and presumably riskier underwriting syndicates that generate comparable revenues over much shorter transactions periods. In so doing, they enable larger, more reputable banks to "buy"market share and league table rankings. The authors' findings underscore three major trends that are shaping global investment banking. First, the fact that accelerated deals are marketed almost exclusively to institutional investors, and that these underwriting methods are gaining market share, suggests the declining importance of retail investors in equity markets everywhere. Second, the rise of accelerated deals both promotes and reflects increasing concentration in the investment banking industry, since only the largest banks have the capital base and risk tolerance required to buy large share blocks outright and assume all or most of the price risk of later resale. Finally, the increasing use of accelerated underwritings for SEOs provides another case of the "commoditization"of financial transactions characterized by relatively low asymmetric information. Since ATs can be employed for shares of only large and well-known companies, these offerings are executed very quickly and cheaply-in much the same way plain vanilla corporate bonds are sold-and with minimal need for the placement and marketing services that investment banks use for IPOs and other non-transparent security offerings.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / +
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Underwriter competition in accelerated seasoned equity offerings: Evidence from Canada
    Gunay, Erdal
    Ursel, Nancy
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2015, 34 : 94 - 110
  • [2] The marketing of seasoned equity offerings
    Gao, Xiaohui
    Ritter, Jay R.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 97 (01) : 33 - 52
  • [3] Seasoned equity crowdfunded offerings*
    Coakley, Jerry
    Lazos, Aristogenis
    Linares-Zegarra, Jose M.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 77
  • [4] Investor recognition and seasoned equity offers
    Autore, Don M.
    Kovacs, Tunde
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 25 : 216 - 233
  • [5] Skewness Preference and Seasoned Equity Offers
    Autore, Don M.
    DeLisle, Jared R.
    REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES, 2016, 5 (02): : 200 - 238
  • [6] ETF Ownership and Seasoned Equity Offerings
    Evans, Kevin P.
    Leung, Woon Sau
    Li, Junqiu
    Mazouz, Khelifa
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2024, 59 (04) : 1821 - 1848
  • [7] The determinants of underpricing for seasoned equity offers
    Corwin, SA
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (05): : 2249 - 2279
  • [8] Is there a window of opportunity for seasoned equity issuance?
    Bayless, M
    Chaplinsky, S
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (01): : 253 - 278
  • [9] Insider signaling and seasoned equity offerings
    Hull, Robert
    Kwak, Sungkyu
    Walker, Rosemary
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2010, 36 (08) : 703 - +
  • [10] Biodiversity risk and seasoned equity offerings
    Liu, Xiaohui
    Li, Yulin
    Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2025, 247