Cross-national case studies have indicated that compared to other economically advanced democracies, American methods of policy implementation and dispute resolution are more adversarial and legalistic, shaped by costly court action or the prospect of it. To what extent are lawyers responsible for creating American-style adversarial legalism? This article argues that while adversarial legalism stems primarily from enduring features of American political culture and governmental structure, the legal profession plays a significant independent role in promoting and perpetuating this mode of governance.
机构:
Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Govt, London WC2A 2AE, EnglandUniv London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Govt, London WC2A 2AE, England
机构:
Univ Wisconsin Madison, Law & Polit Sci, Madison, WI 53715 USA
Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Int Ctr Study Inst & Dev, Moscow, RussiaUniv Wisconsin Madison, Law & Polit Sci, Madison, WI 53715 USA
机构:
Univ Natal, Sch Human & Social Studies, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South AfricaUniv Natal, Sch Human & Social Studies, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa