DO MEDICAL-STUDENTS REMEMBER MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS

被引:5
|
作者
MILLER, BJ [1 ]
EFFENEY, DJ [1 ]
GOUGH, IR [1 ]
机构
[1] ROYAL BRISBANE HOSP,BRISBANE,QLD 4029,AUSTRALIA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00367.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The values of pre-testing senior medical students at the start of their surgical terms are the perception that they acquire of the scope of the subject and the extra practice they gain in the technique of sitting multiple choice question (MCQ) exams. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MCQ in a pre-test that were repeated in a post-test were answered more accurately than questions that had not been repeated. For the past 3 years at the University of Queensland, fifth year medical students have been voluntarily sitting pre- and post-tests in each of the four surgical terms. Each examination consisted of 60 clinically orientated surgical questions of a difficulty appropriate for senior medical students. A total of 404 students did both the pre- and post-tests during 1990 and 1991. The two examinations were carefully chosen for comparability. Of the 60 questions in each examination, 30 were repeated in the post-test and 30 were fresh questions in the post-test. The pre- and post-tests were reversed for the second of the two years to increase consistency. There was a general improvement in the standard of results from the pre-test to the post-test. There was also a small improvement for the repeated questions compared to the non-repeated questions (P < 0.0001). The authors conclude that the marked improvement of the post-test compared to the pre-test is mostly attributable to the students increasing their knowledge base through learning during their surgical term. To a much lesser extent improvement was also attributable to recollection of questions asked of them 6 weeks before, without specific tuition or information about the answers.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 900
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS IN MATHEMATICS
    Smetanova, D.
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 2220 - 2224
  • [33] OVERHEAD PROJECTIONS OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS - STUDENTS AND LECTURERS REACTIONS
    ABOSEDE, OA
    EKUNWE, EO
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1985, 19 (01) : 87 - 87
  • [34] Multiple-choice questions in assessment: Perceptions of medical students from low-resource setting
    Vegi, Venkata
    Sudhakar, P.
    Bhimarasetty, Devi
    Pamarthi, Kiran
    Edara, Lokesh
    Kutikuppala, L.
    Suvvari, Tarun
    Anand, Shubham
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2022, 11 (01) : 103
  • [35] Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students? A comparison of multiple-choice and "equivalent" constructed-response exam questions
    Chan, N
    Kennedy, PE
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2002, 68 (04) : 957 - 971
  • [36] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PICTORIAL MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS AND OTHER MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS ON THE PEDIATRIC SPECIALTY EXAMINATION
    SKAKUN, EN
    TAYLOR, WC
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1985, 8 (03): : A142 - A142
  • [37] Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning?
    Beullens, J
    Struyf, E
    Van Damme, B
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (04) : 410 - 417
  • [38] Introducing multiple-choice questions to promote learning for medical students: effect on exam performance in obstetrics and gynecology
    Sebastian M. Jud
    Susanne Cupisti
    Wolfgang Frobenius
    Andrea Winkler
    Franziska Schultheis
    Sophia Antoniadis
    Matthias W. Beckmann
    Felix Heindl
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 302 : 1401 - 1406
  • [39] Evaluation of the quality of multiple-choice questions according to the students' academic level
    Inarrairaegui, Mercedes
    Fernandez-Ros, Nerea
    Lucena, Felipe
    Landecho, Manuel F.
    Garcia, Nicolas
    Quiroga, Jorge
    Ignacio Herrero, Jose
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [40] Introducing multiple-choice questions to promote learning for medical students: effect on exam performance in obstetrics and gynecology
    Jud, Sebastian M.
    Cupisti, Susanne
    Frobenius, Wolfgang
    Winkler, Andrea
    Schultheis, Franziska
    Antoniadis, Sophia
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Heindl, Felix
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 302 (06) : 1401 - 1406