Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology

被引:75
|
作者
Antunovic, Boris [1 ]
Barlow, Susan [1 ]
Chesson, Andrew [1 ]
Flynn, Albert [1 ]
Hardy, Anthony [1 ]
Jeger, Michael-John [1 ]
Knaap, Ada [1 ]
Kuiper, Harry [1 ]
Lovell, David [1 ]
Mortensen, Alicja [1 ]
Norrung, Birgit [1 ]
Pratt, Iona [1 ]
Schlatter, Josef [1 ]
Silano, Vittorio [1 ]
Smulders, Frans [1 ]
Vannier, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
Risk assessment terminology; harmonisation; EFSA; food safety;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2664
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the use of risk assessment terminology within its Scientific Panels. An external report, commissioned by EFSA, analysed 219 opinions published by the Scientific Committee and Panels to recommend possible ways of improving the expression and communication of risk and/or uncertainties in the selected opinions. The Scientific Committee concluded that risk assessment terminology is not fully harmonised within EFSA. In part this is caused by sectoral legislation defining specific terminology and international standards for specific fields of risk assessment and thus for specific Panels. The use of defined terminology for risk assessment is driven by three standard-setting organisations, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) in relation to food safety, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) for animal health and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) for plant health, under the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of which the European Union is a member. Should the major purpose of risk assessment be international trade, the Scientific Committee concludes that particular care must be taken that the principles of CAC, OIE or IPPC are followed strictly. EFSA Scientific Panels should identify which specific approach is most useful in dealing with their individual mandates. The Scientific Committee considered detailed aspects of risk assessment terminology and identified their relevance for EFSA to adopt more harmonised use. These included examining definitions of risk and uncertainty, expressing uncertainty and different levels of risk, the merits of using qualitative and quantitative expressions and the use of glossaries of definitions to improve both the understanding and harmonisation of terminology across EFSA's scientific opinions. Follow-up action by EFSA is identified to develop appropriate detailed guidance to the Scientific Panels. Recommendations are made to improve the clarity, consistency and where possible the harmonization of risk assessment terminology within and across EFSA's scientific opinions. (C) European Food Safety Authority, 2012.
引用
收藏
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Scientific Opinion on VTEC-seropathotype and scientific criteria regarding pathogenicity assessment
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Baggesen, Dorte Lau
    Bolton, Declan
    Butaye, Patrick
    Cook, Paul
    Davies, Robert
    Escamez, Pablo S. Fernandez
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    Lindqvist, Roland
    McLauchlin, James
    Nesbakken, Truls
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Ricci, Antonia
    Ru, Giuseppe
    Sanaa, Moez
    Simmons, Marion
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (04)
  • [23] Scientific Opinion on BSE risk in bovine intestines and mesentery
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Baggesen, Dorte Lau
    Bolton, Declan
    Butaye, Patrick
    Cook, Paul
    Davies, Robert
    Escamez, Pablo S. Fernandez
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    Lindqvist, Roland
    McLauchlin, James
    Nesbakken, Truls
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Ricci, Antonia
    Ru, Giuseppe
    Sanaa, Moez
    Simmons, Marion
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (02)
  • [24] THE STANDARDIZATION OF HANDWRITING OPINION TERMINOLOGY
    MCALEXANDER, TV
    BECK, J
    DICK, RM
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 1991, 36 (02) : 311 - 318
  • [25] Current opinion on risk assessment of cosmetics
    Kim, Kyu-Bong
    Kwack, Seung Jun
    Lee, Joo Young
    Kacew, Sam
    Lee, Byung-Mu
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2021, 24 (04): : 137 - 161
  • [26] Microbiological risk assessment in feedingstuffs for food-producing animals Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Budka, Herbert
    Buncic, Sava
    Colin, Pierre
    Collins, John D.
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Griffin, John
    Havelaar, Arie
    Hope, James
    Klein, Guenter
    Kruse, Hilde
    Magnino, Simone
    Lopez, Antonio Martinez
    McLauchlin, James
    Nguyen-The, Christophe
    Noeckler, Karsten
    Noerrung, Birgit
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Roberts, Terence
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2008, 6 (07)
  • [27] Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms
    Ockleford, Colin
    Adriaanse, Paulien
    Berny, Philippe
    Brock, Theodorus
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Grilli, Sandro
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Machera, Kyriaki
    Pelkonen, Olavi
    Pieper, Silvia
    Stemmer, Michael
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Teodorovic, Ivana
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Topping, Chris J.
    Wolterink, Gerrit
    Craig, Peter
    de Jong, Frank
    Manachini, Barbara
    Sousa, Paulo
    Swarowsky, Klaus
    Auteri, Domenica
    Arena, Maria
    Rob, Smith
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (02)
  • [28] Regeneration and scientific terminology
    Newmark, PA
    Sanchez, A
    BIOESSAYS, 1997, 19 (06) : 535 - 535
  • [29] Scientific terminology revisited
    Dubowsky, N
    Harman, EM
    AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 1999, 61 (04): : 244 - 245
  • [30] Scientific Opinion updating the risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize MON 810
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Birch, Andrew Nicholas Edmund
    Chesson, Andrew
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Gathmann, Achim
    Gropp, Juergen
    Herman, Lieve
    Hoen-Sorteberg, Hilde-Gunn
    Jones, Huw
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Lovik, Martinus
    Messean, Antoine
    Naegeli, Hanspeter
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Ovesna, Jaroslava
    Perry, Joe
    Rostoks, Nils
    Tebbe, Christoph
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (12)