Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology

被引:75
|
作者
Antunovic, Boris [1 ]
Barlow, Susan [1 ]
Chesson, Andrew [1 ]
Flynn, Albert [1 ]
Hardy, Anthony [1 ]
Jeger, Michael-John [1 ]
Knaap, Ada [1 ]
Kuiper, Harry [1 ]
Lovell, David [1 ]
Mortensen, Alicja [1 ]
Norrung, Birgit [1 ]
Pratt, Iona [1 ]
Schlatter, Josef [1 ]
Silano, Vittorio [1 ]
Smulders, Frans [1 ]
Vannier, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
Risk assessment terminology; harmonisation; EFSA; food safety;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2664
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the use of risk assessment terminology within its Scientific Panels. An external report, commissioned by EFSA, analysed 219 opinions published by the Scientific Committee and Panels to recommend possible ways of improving the expression and communication of risk and/or uncertainties in the selected opinions. The Scientific Committee concluded that risk assessment terminology is not fully harmonised within EFSA. In part this is caused by sectoral legislation defining specific terminology and international standards for specific fields of risk assessment and thus for specific Panels. The use of defined terminology for risk assessment is driven by three standard-setting organisations, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) in relation to food safety, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) for animal health and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) for plant health, under the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of which the European Union is a member. Should the major purpose of risk assessment be international trade, the Scientific Committee concludes that particular care must be taken that the principles of CAC, OIE or IPPC are followed strictly. EFSA Scientific Panels should identify which specific approach is most useful in dealing with their individual mandates. The Scientific Committee considered detailed aspects of risk assessment terminology and identified their relevance for EFSA to adopt more harmonised use. These included examining definitions of risk and uncertainty, expressing uncertainty and different levels of risk, the merits of using qualitative and quantitative expressions and the use of glossaries of definitions to improve both the understanding and harmonisation of terminology across EFSA's scientific opinions. Follow-up action by EFSA is identified to develop appropriate detailed guidance to the Scientific Panels. Recommendations are made to improve the clarity, consistency and where possible the harmonization of risk assessment terminology within and across EFSA's scientific opinions. (C) European Food Safety Authority, 2012.
引用
收藏
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology
    Epstein, Michelle M.
    Vermeire, Theo
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (08) : 601 - 603
  • [2] Scientific Opinion on the environmental risk assessment of the apple snail for the EU
    Baker, Richard
    Bragard, Claude
    Candresse, Thierry
    Gilioli, Gianni
    Gregoire, Jean-Claude
    Holb, Imre
    Jeger, Michael John
    Karadjova, Olia Evtimova
    Magnusson, Christer
    Makowski, David
    Manceau, Charles
    Navajas, Maria
    Rafoss, Trond
    Rossi, Vittorio
    Schans, Jan
    Schrader, Gritta
    Urek, Gregor
    van Lenteren, Johan Coert
    Vloutoglou, Irene
    van der Werf, Wopke
    Winter, Stephan
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (04)
  • [3] Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
    Ockleford, Colin
    Adriaanse, Paulien
    Berny, Philippe
    Brock, Theodorus
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Grilli, Sandro
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Machera, Kyriaki
    Pelkonen, Olavi
    Pieper, Silvia
    Stemmer, Michael
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Teodorovic, Ivana
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Topping, Chris J.
    Wolterink, Gerrit
    Aldrich, Annette
    Berg, Cecilia
    Ortiz-Santaliestra, Manuel
    Weir, Scott
    Streissl, Franz
    Smith, Robert H.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (02)
  • [4] Scientific Opinion on Evaluation of the Toxicological Relevance of Pesticide Metabolites for Dietary Risk Assessment
    Boesten, Jos
    Bolognesi, Claudia
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Hardy, Anthony
    Hart, Andrew
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen Ildico
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Luttik, Robert
    Machera, Kyriaki
    Moretto, Angelo
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Petersen, Annette
    Pico, Yolanda
    Schaeffer, Andreas
    Sousa, Paulo
    Steurbaut, Walter
    Stromberg, Anita
    Tasheva, Maria
    van der Linden, Ton
    Vleminckx, Christiane
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)
  • [5] Scientific Opinion on Priority topics for the development of risk assessment guidance by EFSA's Scientific Committee EFSA Scientific Committee
    Alexander, Jan
    Benford, Diane
    Chaudhry, Qasim
    Hardy, Anthony
    Jeger, Michael John
    Luttik, Robert
    Martin, Ambroise
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    More, Simon
    Mortensen, Alicja
    Norrung, Birgit
    Perry, Joe
    Pratt, Iona
    Sofos, John
    Schlatter, Josef
    Sejrsen, Kristen
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (08)
  • [6] Introduction to Risk Assessment Terminology
    Serraino, Andrea
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY, 2014, 3 (01): : 33 - 33
  • [7] Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the risk of solanaceous pospiviroids for the EU territory and the identification and evaluation of risk management options
    Baker, Richard
    Candresse, Thierry
    Simon, Erzsebet Dormannsne
    Gilioli, Gianni
    Gregoire, Jean-Claude
    Jeger, Michael John
    Karadjova, Olia Evtimova
    Loevei, Gabor
    Makowski, David
    Manceau, Charles
    Navajas, Maria
    Puglia, Angelo Porta
    Rafoss, Trond
    Rossi, Vittorio
    Schans, Jan
    Schrader, Gritta
    Urek, Gregor
    van Lenteren, Johan Coert
    Vloutoglou, Irene
    Winter, Stephan
    Zlotina, Marina
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (08)
  • [8] CLASSIFICATION TERMINOLOGY - OPINION
    DAHLBERG, I
    NACHRICHTEN FUR DOKUMENTATION, 1973, 24 (06): : 271 - 273
  • [9] Scientific Opinion on the revision of the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal proteins (PAPs)
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Budka, Herbert
    Buncic, Sava
    Collins, John D.
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie
    Hope, James
    Klein, Guenter
    McLauchlin, James
    Mueller-Graf, Christine
    Nguyen-The, Christophe
    Noerrung, Birgit
    Peixe, Luisa
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Ricci, Antonia
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (01)
  • [10] On Scientific Terminology
    Sakuma, Kanne
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1933, 8 (01): : 439 - +