A Balanced Scorecard framework for R&D

被引:25
|
作者
Garcia-Valderrama, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Mulero-Mendigorri, Eva [1 ,3 ]
Revuelta-Bordoy, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cadiz, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresari, Dept Econ Empresa, Cadiz, Spain
[2] Univ Cadiz, Dept Business Econ, Management Accounting, Cadiz, Spain
[3] Univ Cadiz, Dept Business Econ, Financial Accounting, Cadiz, Spain
[4] Univ Cadiz, Dept Business Econ, Cadiz, Spain
关键词
Balanced scorecard; Research and development; Content management; Strategic management;
D O I
10.1108/14601060810869884
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to produce a general Balanced Scorecard (BSC) model that is designed and delimited for managing research and development (R&D) activities. Design/methodology/approach - A methodology based on the validity of content of an instrument of measurement, within the analytical framework of the validation of scales or constructs was employed. Findings - The BSC model for R&D developed in this study has been subject to testing with recognised experts in management and in R&D. It has enabled a proposal to be put forward in respect of those indicators that best define the factors related to organisational effectiveness in the achievement of the strategic objectives set by companies, and to inter-relate them and group them under five broad perspectives of the BSC. Research limitations/implications - The BSC will be validated as a construct in future research. Practical implications - The result is the design of a scale of measurement that ranks the empirical indicators under the perspectives of the BSC; for the measurement of results, this instrument will provide unique values that group all the previous indicators in a single scale of measurement. Originality/value - No studies dealing with the content validation of a BSC have been found in the literature on innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / +
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global framework on essential health R&D
    Chirac, P
    Torreele, E
    LANCET, 2006, 367 (9522): : 1560 - 1561
  • [42] A decision framework for R&D project selection
    Coldrick, S
    Lawson, CP
    Ivey, PC
    Lockwood, C
    IEMC-2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGING TECHNOLOGY FOR THE NEW ECONOMY, 2002, : 413 - 418
  • [43] Framework for understanding commitment in the R&D organization
    Starling, Grover
    Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 1991, 7 (3-4): : 251 - 265
  • [44] R&D -: Europe compromises on Fifth Framework
    不详
    EUROPEAN CHEMICAL NEWS, 1998, 69 (1801): : 31 - 31
  • [45] A Mission Assurance Framework for R&D Organizations
    Hahn, Heidi Ann (Hahn@lanl.gov), 1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (26):
  • [46] A Systems Engineering Framework for R&D Organizations
    Lombardo, Nicholas
    Millard, David
    Sturges, Mark
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2015, 25 (01) : 1020 - 1034
  • [47] A conceptual framework for ranking R&D projects
    Bitman, William Robert
    Sharif, Nawaz
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (02) : 267 - 278
  • [48] HOW APPROPRIATE IS THE BALANCED SCORECARD AS AN INTERNAL REPORTING FRAMEWORK?
    Mountcastle, Paul
    Yahanpath, Noel
    ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2015, 10 (02): : 1 - 20
  • [49] IT Strategy Alignment in University Using IT Balanced Scorecard Framework
    Herdiansyah, Muhammad Izman
    Kunang, Suzi Oktavia
    Akbar, Muhammad
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 20 (10-12) : 2038 - 2041
  • [50] Beyond the Balanced Scorecard: Towards the Dynamic Balanced Scorecard
    Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan
    UKSIM 2009: ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2009, : 317 - 321