首页
学术期刊
论文检测
AIGC检测
热点
更多
数据
Constitutional Law - Standing of State Agency to Challenge Constitutionality of a State Statute
被引:0
|
作者
:
不详
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
不详
机构
:
来源
:
IOWA LAW REVIEW
|
1955年
/ 41卷
/ 01期
关键词
:
D O I
:
暂无
中图分类号
:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号
:
0301 ;
摘要
:
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 144
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A STATUTE RESTRICTING COMMON LAW REMEDY FOR LIBEL
不详
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
不详
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW,
1906,
6
(02)
: 117
-
118
[32]
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: TAXATION: CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOLDIERS' BONUS LAW
不详
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
不详
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW,
1921,
10
(01)
: 75
-
79
[33]
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - VAGRANCY STATUTE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
不详
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
不详
IOWA LAW REVIEW,
1968,
53
(05)
: 1188
-
1196
[34]
STATE STANDING TO CHALLENGE FEDERAL AUTHORITY IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE
Roesler, Shannon M.
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
机构:
Oklahoma City Univ, Sch Law, Law, Oklahoma City, OK 73106 USA
Oklahoma City Univ, Sch Law, Law, Oklahoma City, OK 73106 USA
Roesler, Shannon M.
WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW,
2016,
91
(02)
: 637
-
702
[35]
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - LIBERALIZED ABORTION STATUTE HELD CONSTITUTIONAL
不详
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
不详
FORDHAM LAW REVIEW,
1972,
41
(02)
: 439
-
449
[36]
CONSTITUTIONAL STATE AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - GERMAN - LEIBHOLZ,G
RIDDER, H
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
RIDDER, H
POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT,
1974,
15
(3-4)
: 577
-
579
[37]
Identity and interpretation in state constitutional law
Schapiro, RA
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
机构:
Emory Univ, Sch Law, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
Emory Univ, Sch Law, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
Schapiro, RA
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW,
1998,
84
(03)
: 389
-
457
[38]
COUNTERREVOLUTION IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL-LAW
不详
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
不详
STANFORD LAW REVIEW,
1963,
15
(02)
: 309
-
330
[39]
THE CONSTITUTIONAL-LAW OF THE SECURITY STATE
MILLER, AS
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
MILLER, AS
STANFORD LAW REVIEW,
1958,
10
(04)
: 620
-
671
[40]
REVERSE INCORPORATION OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Blocher, Joseph
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
Blocher, Joseph
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW,
2011,
84
(02)
: 323
-
386
←
1
2
3
4
5
→