HEADACHE AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - A COMPARISON OF THE 27-GAUGE QUINCKE AND 24-GAUGE SPROTTE NEEDLES

被引:0
|
作者
MAYER, DC
QUANCE, D
WEEKS, SK
机构
[1] MCGILL UNIV,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,MONTREAL H3A 2T5,QUEBEC,CANADA
[2] ROYAL VICTORIA HOSP,MONTREAL H3A 1A1,QUEBEC,CANADA
[3] SIR MORTIMER B DAVIS JEWISH HOSP,MONTREAL H3T 1E2,QUEBEC,CANADA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 1992年 / 75卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A high incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. To examine this problem, a study was conducted with the recently developed 24-gauge Sprotte and 27-gauge Quincke needles in patients undergoing elective and emergency cesarean section (n = 298). The needle to be used was assigned in a random manner: group 1, 27-gauge Quincke (n = 147); group II, 24-gauge Sprotte (n = 151). During the postoperative period, patients were visited daily and asked specifically about the presence and severity of headache. The overall incidence of PDPH was 2% (n = 6), five in the Quincke group (3.5%) and one in the Sprotte group (0.7%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PDPH between the two groups. Five headaches were classified as mild, and only one was moderate to severe. All headaches resolved quickly with conservative management and without blood patch. The authors conclude that the choice between a 27-gauge Quincke and a 24-gauge Sprotte needle does not influence the incidence of PDPH after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 380
页数:4
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] HEADACHE AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - A COMPARISON OF THE 27-GAUGE QUINCKE AND 24-GAUGE SPROTTE NEEDLES
    LEWIS, IH
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1993, 76 (06): : 1377 - 1377
  • [2] SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF 22-GAUGE AND 25-GAUGE WHITACRE NEEDLES WITH 26-GAUGE QUINCKE NEEDLES
    SHUTT, LE
    VALENTINE, SJ
    WEE, MYK
    PAGE, RJ
    PROSSER, A
    THOMAS, TA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (06) : 589 - 594
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE 25-GAUGE WHITACRE WITH THE 24-GAUGE SPROTTE SPINAL NEEDLE FOR ELECTIVE CESAREAN-SECTION - COST IMPLICATIONS
    CAMPBELL, DC
    DOUGLAS, MJ
    PAVY, TJG
    MERRICK, P
    FLANAGAN, ML
    MCMORLAND, GH
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (12): : 1131 - 1135
  • [4] POSTDURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE AND AIR-TRAVEL AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA WITH A 24-GAUGE SPROTTE NEEDLE
    PANADERO, A
    BRAVO, P
    GARCIAPEDRAJAS, F
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 20 (05) : 463 - 464
  • [5] PDPH IN OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA - COMPARISON OF 24-GAUGE SPROTTE AND 25-GAUGE QUINCKE NEEDLES AND EFFECT OF SUBARACHNOID ADMINISTRATION OF FENTANYL
    DEVCIC, A
    MAITRADCRUZE, A
    SPRUNG, J
    PATEL, S
    KETTLER, R
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 18 (04) : 222 - 225
  • [6] THE USE OF QUINCKE AND WHITACRE 27-GAUGE NEEDLES IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS - INCIDENCE OF FAILED SPINAL-ANESTHESIA AND POSTDURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE
    LYNCH, J
    KASPER, SM
    STRICK, K
    TOPALIDIS, K
    SCHAAF, H
    ZECH, D
    KRINGSERNST, I
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1994, 79 (01): : 124 - 128
  • [7] Postdural puncture headache and back pain after spinal anesthesia with 27-gauge Quincke and 26-gauge Atraucan needles
    Schultz, AM
    Ulbing, S
    Kaider, A
    Lehofer, F
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 21 (05) : 461 - 464
  • [8] HEADACHE - NEW NEEDLES AND SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION
    THORMANN, F
    HENRY, M
    SOLER, JP
    SEEBACHER, J
    VIARS, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 : 90 - 90
  • [9] POSTDURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE 24 GAUGE SPROTTE AND THE 27 GAUGE QUINCKE NEEDLES IN YOUNG-PATIENTS
    WIESEL, S
    TESSLER, MJ
    EASDOWN, LJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (07): : 607 - 611
  • [10] Comparison of the flow rates of 27-gauge Whitacre and Sprotte needles for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia
    Waldman, SA
    Liguori, GA
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 21 (04) : 378 - 379