MAINSTREAMING NATURAL CAPITAL AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES INTO MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Tsibulnikova, Margarita R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Tomsk Polytech Univ, Tomsk, Russia
来源
关键词
natural capital; ecosystem services; Environmental and Economic Accounting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recent decades have witnessed drastic changes in people's perception of environment protection and sustainable development. The sphere of understanding of this issue has broadened to consciousness of advantages and losses from the natural capital, namely earth and water landscapes and their biodiversity. The importance of natural capital preservation for provision of steady flow of benefits from the ecosystem services is seen as vital for both wealthy and poor countries. Nowadays, the task is to integrate ecosystem services into practical solutions. This requires joint understanding of production of ecosystem services and of quantitative variety of benefits from them by various strata of society; understanding of the decision-making process by individuals, corporations, governments, the integration of scientific studies accompanied with institutional changes. The provision of rational nature management requires a mechanism of involvement of the natural capital and ecosystem services into the process of making managerial decisions on the basis of the monitoring system of ecoeconomic value of the natural capital. Interfaced development of the two scientific fields is crucial for environmental management economization. The first scientific field is perfection of economic assessment methods. The other one, equally representing an important part of the process, is the data collecting system on the use of natural capital reserves in all the spheres of natural management, including housekeeping. The UN statistics department proposed SEEA (System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting System) compatible with SNA (National Accounts System) in 1993. National Accounts classifies natural resources as tangible non-produced assets. Thus, EEAS is a product of new SNA, in which special attention is paid to the necessity of ecological sustainability assessment of economic growth. According to the analysis of the federal state statistical monitoring system in the sphere of natural resources recognition, the official statistics only contains information about the real volume of natural resources use and does not reflect their economic usage. The exploitation of natural resources in the household sector is not reflected in the statistical monitoring system. Improvement of the data collecting system in the sphere of natural resources exploitation is necessary for involvement of natural capital and ecosystem services in the process of making business and power. This process should be implemented in two directions: firstly, it is aggregation of data on physical and monetary flows within the natural resources sector in the statistical monitoring system; secondly, it is involvement into the statistical monitoring system of household activity in the sphere of natural resources exploitation. Restructuring of the statistical monitoring system and creation of the economic value monitoring system of natural capital, including the household sector, will make it possible to plan regional growth with regard to the population interests concerning creation of additional jobs and poverty level reduction. Besides, this will enable to involve natural capital into the process of making managerial decisions of power and business.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
    Guerry, Anne D.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Lubchenco, Jane
    Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Griffin, Robert
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Duraiappah, Anantha
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Feldman, Marcus W.
    Folke, Carl
    Hoekstra, Jon
    Kareiva, Peter M.
    Keeler, Bonnie L.
    Li, Shuzhuo
    McKenzie, Emily
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Reyers, Belinda
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    Rockstrom, Johan
    Tallis, Heather
    Vira, Bhaskar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (24) : 7348 - 7355
  • [2] On the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils
    Robinson, David A.
    Lebron, Inma
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 70 (02) : 137 - 138
  • [3] Recreational fisheries in the UK: natural capital, ecosystem services, threats, and management
    Ian J. Winfield
    Fisheries Science, 2016, 82 : 203 - 212
  • [4] Recreational fisheries in the UK: natural capital, ecosystem services, threats, and management
    Winfield, Ian J.
    FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2016, 82 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [5] The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation
    Turner, R. K.
    Daily, G. C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (01): : 25 - 35
  • [6] Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Costanza, Robert
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Jorgensen, Sven Erik
    Potschin, Marion
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 1 - 6
  • [7] Problems of Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital Evaluation
    Ivanovic, Olja Munitlak
    Zubovic, Jovan
    Mitic, Petar
    ECONOMIC DYNAMICS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - RESOURCES, FACTORS, STRUCTURES AND POLICIES, PT 1, 2016, : 253 - 266
  • [8] Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Environmental Accounting
    Manes, Fausto
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Paletto, Alessandro
    Franzese, Pier Paolo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 10 (03) : 215 - 217
  • [9] The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation
    R. K. Turner
    G. C. Daily
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2008, 39 : 25 - 35
  • [10] Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?
    Wainger, Lisa A.
    King, Dennis M.
    Mack, Richard N.
    Price, Elizabeth W.
    Maslin, Thomas
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) : 978 - 987