Teachers Living with Contradictions: Social Representations of Inclusion, Exclusion and Stratification in Israeli Schools

This paper describes part of an ethnographic research study that examined the Social Representations of inclusion and stratification within Israeli elementary schools. These concepts derive from separate theoretical sources. Inclusion is a central concept in educational thinking and research; stratification is a frequently used term in sociology. Two other closely related concepts are exclusion, derived from critical political research and teachers' differential behavior, an individual- centered concept derived from psychological approaches. The use of Social Representations Theory (SRT) enabled us to examine everyday life situations in schools through the prisms of sociological and psychological approaches combining the collective and individual, and facilitate a new perspective. The findings revealed a dichotomy in school life between inclusion and stratification. The declared school ideology was that of inclusion and of objection to exclusion and to stratification, whereas the daily discourse and the main school practice served the purpose of stratification. To cope with these incompatible representations, the teachers developed different kinds of camouflage strategies expressed in their school practice and daily discourse. Their strategies helped them deal with, solve or ignore the gap between these two goals without seemingly choosing one goal over another.In the discussion I argue that these strategies structure the teacher's world in order to reduce the discomfort arising from this incompatibility, to turn the unfamiliar to familiar and to create camouflaged reality in which they can live.