EVALUATING WEAPON SYSTEM USING FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS-BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT

被引:229
|
作者
MON, DL [1 ]
CHENG, CH [1 ]
LIN, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] CHUNG CHENG INST TECHNOL,DEPT WEAPON SYST ENGN,TAHSI 33509,TAIWAN
关键词
MILITARY APPLICATION; TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (TMS); FUZZY NUMBER; ALPHA-CUTS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); INTERVAL ARITHMETIC; ENTROPY WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/0165-0114(94)90052-3
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The performance evaluation of weapon systems are multiple criteria decision making problems. The descriptions and judgements on weapon systems are usually linguistic and fuzzy. The traditional method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are mainly used in crisp (non-fuzzy) decision applications with a very unbalanced scale of judgements. To overcome these problems, we will propose a new and general decision making method for evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy AHP based on entropy weight. We will use symmetric triangular fuzzy number 1 to 9 to indicate the relative strength of the elements in the hierarchy, and build fuzzy judgement vectors (matrix) through comparison of the performance scores. We will derive the priority among the alternatives by the entropy weight through the use of interval arithmetic, alpha-cuts, and index of optimism (the degree of optimism of the decision maker) to estimate the degree of satisfaction of the judgement. In this way it does not require a series of pairwise comparison judgements as required by the traditional AHP method. By multiplying the fuzzy subjective weight vector W with the corresponding fuzzy judgement matrix X (the orderly list of fuzzy judgement vectors x.i for every criterion C(i)), a fuzzy problem can be solved and a weapon system selection example will be used to illustrate our method and compare it with other methods.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATING WEAPON SYSTEM BY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS-BASED ON FUZZY SCALES
    CHENG, CH
    MON, DL
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1994, 63 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] EVALUATING A WEAPON SYSTEM USING FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS
    CHENG, CH
    MON, DL
    DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1994, 44 (02) : 165 - 172
  • [3] Evaluating the Double-Stage Coupled Heat Pump System Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on Entropy Weight
    Dong Fei
    Ni Long
    Yao Yang
    Ma Zuiliang
    ICEET: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 631 - 635
  • [4] Analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy sorting: An analytic hierarchy process-based method for fuzzy classification in sorting problems
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Tasiou, Menelaos
    Martinez, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2020, 71 (06) : 928 - 947
  • [5] Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Mobile Robot Path Planning
    Kim, Changwon
    Kim, Yeesock
    Yi, Hak
    ELECTRONICS, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [6] A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based framework for air cargo infrastructure location
    Lakshmanan, Ravi
    Dhingra, Tarun
    Raju, T. Bangar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AVIATION, 2024, 10 (01) : 76 - 98
  • [7] Evaluation of slab track quality indices based on entropy weight-fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Ren, Juan-juan
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, Yi-chi
    Wei, Kai
    Zhang, Kai-yao
    Ye, Wen-long
    Zhang, Ying
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2023, 149
  • [8] Evaluating Project Management Criteria Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Mohammed, Husam Jasim
    Al-Jubori, Ihsan Ali Mubarak
    Kasim, Maznah Mat
    4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019), 2019, 2138
  • [9] A fuzzy inference- fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based clinical decision support system for diagnosis of heart diseases
    Nazari, Somayeh
    Fallah, Mohammad
    Kazemipoor, Hamed
    Salehipour, Amir
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 95 : 261 - 271
  • [10] Evaluating software quality of vendors using fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Yuen, Kevin K. F.
    Lau, Henry C. W.
    IMECS 2008: INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 126 - 130