Critical Illness Scoring Systems: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation I and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment to Predict the Clinical Outcomes in Scrub Typhus Patients with Organ Dysfunctions

被引:0
|
作者
Balasubramanian, Prasanth [1 ]
Sharma, Navneet [1 ]
Biswal, Manisha [2 ]
Bhalla, Ashish [1 ]
Kumar, Susheel [1 ]
Kumar, Vivek [3 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER, Dept Internal Med, Chandigarh, India
[2] PGIMER, Dept Microbiol, Chandigarh, India
[3] PGIMER, Dept Nephrol, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; organ dysfunction; quick sequential organ failure assessment; scrub typhus; sequential organ failure assessment;
D O I
10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_254_18
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Scrub typhus (ST) is an acute infectious disease of variable severity caused by Orientia (formerly Rickettsia) tsutsugamushi. The disease can be complicated by organ dysfunctions and the case fatality rate (CFR) is approximately 15%, which further rises with the development of severe complications. We studied the clinical features of the ST and the performance of critical illness scoring systems (CISSs) - Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and quick SOFA (qSOFA) in predicting the clinical outcomes in complicated ST (cST) patients admitted to the emergency department.Study Design and Methods: A prospective observational study was done in 50 patients diagnosed to have cST with one or more organ dysfunctions. Clinical features and laboratory parameters were recorded and the patients were followed up until the end of their stay in the hospital. APACHE II, SOFA, and qSOFA scores at admission were calculated and were analyzed in predicting the clinical outcomes.Results: The median SOFA, APACHE II, and qSOFA scores of the cohort were 7 (interquartile range [IQR] = 13-22), 8 (IQR = 5-11), and 2 (IQR = 1-3), respectively. The median duration of in-hospital stay was 9 (IQR 5-11) days and overall CFR was 8%. On bivariate analysis, both SOFA (P = 0.031) and qSOFA (P = 0.001) predicted mortality. I lowever, only SOFA score correlated with the in-hospital stay duration (Pearson's correlation = 0.311, P = 0.028). Conclusion: Among the three CISSs studied, the SOFA score correlated with in-hospital stay duration and mortality, whereas the qSOFA score formed a simple as well as a convenient tool in predicting the mortality in patients of cST with organ dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 710
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUICK SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT IN ACUTE-ON-CHRONIC LIVER FAILURE PATIENTS
    Song, Do Seon
    Kim, Hee Yeon
    Yoon, Eileen
    Kim, Chang Wook
    Jung, Young Kul
    Suk, Ki Tae
    Jun, Baek Gyu
    Yim, Hyung-Joon
    Lee, Sung Won
    Kang, Seong Hee
    Jang, Jae Young
    Kim, Moon Young
    Kim, Sang Gyune
    Yang, Jinmo
    Park, Jung Gil
    Kim, Won
    Kim, Dong Joon
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 1124 - 1124
  • [2] Risk Stratification Tools in Sepsis: From Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment*
    Lee, Jessica T.
    Mikkelsen, Mark E.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (08) : 1159 - 1161
  • [3] Evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scoring systems for prognostication of outcomes among Intensive Care Unit's patients
    Hosseini, M.
    Ramazani, J.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 10 (02) : 168 - 173
  • [4] Comparative evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring systems in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit
    Argyriou, George
    Vrettou, Charikleia S.
    Filippatos, Gerasimos
    Sainis, George
    Nanas, Serafeim
    Routsi, Christina
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 30 (04) : 752 - 757
  • [5] Predictive Performance of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scoring in an Argentinian Hospital
    Osatnik, Javier
    Tort-Oribea, Barbara
    Folco, Juan
    Sosa, Ariel
    Ivulich, Dabiel
    Mercedes Kleinert, Maria
    Eugenio Roberti, Javier
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (10) : OC22 - OC26
  • [6] Accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring in clinical practice
    Tallgren, M.
    Backlund, M.
    Hynninen, M.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 53 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [7] Comparison of postinjury multiple-organ failure scoring systems: Denver versus Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
    Dewar, David C.
    White, Amanda
    Attia, John
    Tarrant, Seth M.
    King, Kate L.
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 77 (04): : 624 - 629
  • [8] No Association Between Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Outcomes of Patients With Cirrhosis and Infections
    Patidar, Kavish R.
    Shaw, Jawaid
    Acharya, Chathur
    Thacker, Leroy R.
    White, Melanie B.
    Ganapathy, Dinesh
    Fagan, Andrew
    Gavis, Edith A.
    Bajaj, Jasmohan S.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (11) : 1803 - 1804
  • [9] Prospective evaluation of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in neurosurgical patients
    Flinspach, A. N.
    Konczalla, J.
    Seifert, V
    Zacharowski, K.
    Herrmann, E.
    Adam, E. H.
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2022, 63 : 100 - 108
  • [10] Reliability and accuracy of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring
    Arts, DGT
    de Keizer, NF
    Vroom, MB
    de Jonge, E
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) : 1988 - 1993