Purpose Into Practice: The Problems and Possibilities of Rationale-Based Practice in Social Studies

被引:7
作者
Hawley, Todd S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Sch Teaching Learning & Curriculum Studies, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00933104.2010.10473419
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recently, rationale development has received renewed attention as a core theme of social studies teacher education. To date, however, this interest has yet to spark a significant body of research. This study addresses the gap between recommendations and research regarding rationale development in teacher education programs and the rationale-based practices of first-year teachers. In this article, the author discusses findings from a year-long, qualitative, multiple-case, case study that examined the problems and possibilities of rationale-based practice in social studies classrooms. Three themes emerged during data analysis: (a) teacher versus "the system," (b) rationale meets reality, and (c) built-in guilt. These themes demonstrate that rationale-based practice is possible; however, gaps exist between ideas in participants' rationales and their practice as first-year teachers. As such, teacher educators need to reframe programs and courses around rationale development and implementation to help bridge this gap.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 162
页数:32
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Barr R. D., 1978, NATURE SOCIAL STUDIE
[2]  
Barton K. C., 2004, TEACHING HIST COMMON
[3]  
Bassey M., 1999, CASE STUDY RES ED SE
[4]  
Brophy J.E., 1997, TEACHING LEARNING HI
[5]  
Burr Vivien, 2015, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONI
[6]  
Burt R.S, 2005, BROKERAGE CLOSURE IN
[7]  
Cochran-Smith M., 2005, STUDYING TEACHER ED, P69
[8]  
Darling -Hammond L., 2005, PREPARING TEACHERS C, P169
[9]  
Dinkelman T., 2009, J INQUIRY ACTION ED, V2, P91
[10]  
Ezzy D., 2002, QUALITATIVE ANAL PRA