HALLORAN V VIRGINIA-CHEMICALS-INC - ADMISSIBILITY OF HABIT EVIDENCE IN NEW-YORK TO PROVE NEGLIGENCE

被引：0

|

作者：

DRUMM, KA

机构：

来源：

BUFFALO LAW REVIEW | 1978年 / 27卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：511 / 520

页数：10

相关论文

共 5 条

[1] ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFECTIVE CONFESSIONS FOR IMPEACHMENT - ARTICLE 38.22 AND HARRIS V NEW-YORK
IRVIN, MP
HOUSTON LAW REVIEW, 1973, 11 (01) : 193 - 199
[2] ABANDONING NEW-YORK GENERAL ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENT - REDESIGNING PROPOSED RULE-OF-EVIDENCE-702(B) AFTER DAUBERT V MERRELL-DOW-PHARMACEUTICALS,-INC
GRAHAM, SJ
BUFFALO LAW REVIEW, 1995, 43 (01): : 229 - 261
[3] LEGITIMIZING THE USE OF NEW-YORK FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAW AS A DISCOVERY DEVICE IN CIVIL LITIGATION AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT - M-FARBMAN-AND-SONS-INC V NEW-YORK-CITY-HEALTH-AND-HOSPITALS-CORP
MODICA, SV
SYRACUSE LAW REVIEW, 1985, 36 (03) : 1125 - 1153
[4] The Buckhannon stops here:: Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources should not apply to the New York Equal Access to Justice Act
Chan, A
FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2004, 72 (04) : 1341 - 1379
[5] THE ADMISSIBILITY OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN NEW YORK STATE SEX OFFENDER CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARINGS AFTER STATE V. FLOYD Y.: FINDING A BALANCE BETWEEN PROMOTING THE GENERAL WELFARE OF SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS AND PROVIDING DUE PROCESS OF LAW
Dryer, Brittany K.
FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2015, 84 (01) : 237 - 279