Although, over the centuries, disabled persons have been successively considered to be an image of evil, pity, or sin, what image and what rights are provided by the French law of 1110212005 on equal rights, participation and citizenship of disabled persons? Isn't there still an enormous gap between written laws and what really happens in everyday life, as dozens of laws have been added since the first law voted in the 19th century ? The vocabulary has also changed over the years from mutilated, to handicapped, to disabled. The marked differences between official figures and figures derived from the HID (Handicap Independence Incapacity) survey conducted between 1998 and 2001, clearly illustrates the difficulty of defining disability. With ageing of the French population aging and improvement of technologies, the number of disable persons will increase considerably over the years to come. Does the new law of 11/02/2005 provide a solution to this urgent situation? Has it identified all of the problems concerning accessibility, human assistance, schooling, rights of the disabled or is it just another law on disability, which is more useful to the legislator than to the people concerned? The new law focuses on four points. First of all, the right to compensation by creating a disability pension, which replaces third party benefits and professional fees benefits and adult disability pension, the right to schooling for all disabled children, the right to employment, and finally the creation of departmental disability centres, staffed by the various actors currently involved in the care of the disabled (Conseil General, DDASS, CPAM, CAF, etc ... ). Creation of the disability pension is now based on five main types of assistance: human assistance, technical assistance, adaptation of the home and the vehicle as well as excess transport costs, animal assistance, and finally exceptional and specific aids. Apart from direct assistance to disabled persons, the new law is also designed to improve accessibility (law and decrees already in application since 1991 and 1994) to transport, public places, etc. However, the law also gives another definition of accessibility by extending its scope to all aspects of disability (motor, sensory, cognitive, mental, etc.). This accessibility must be implemented within defined deadlines: 3 years for transport, 5 years for universities and prefectures, and 10 years for other public buildings. Another innovation of this law is that of the initial training and continuing education of healthcare professionals of the medical and social sector (cause of disability, therapeutic innovations, educational innovations, reception and supportive care of disabled persons, announcement of disability, etc.). However, as so little progress has been made the over the centuries, many disabled people will be left by the wayside. Although politicians have now become aware of the problem, the errors, delays, and imperfections of this new law will allow tolerance rather than insertion of the disabled in the years to come. We must develop a different vision of disability, as illustrated by the creation, in 2002, of a European Commission network called "Design for All" to develop systems that can be used by healthy as well as disabled persons. Disabled persons are also trying to find solutions concerning parenthood and childbirth, as although the law has defined " all" aspects for healthy parents with a disabled child, no measures have been taken for disabled parents. The Mother-Child Department of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris is developing a programme for these future parents with the help of ESCAVIE (Espace Conseil pour l'autonomie en milieu ordinaire de vie) in collaboration with the occupational therapist and social worker. A disabled parents association has also been formed in the Mother-Child Department. A last point does not directly concern the new law, but the bioethics law of August 2004 and preimplantation diagnosis, which was the subject of a recent debate concerning its revision. The old myth of birth control has resurfaced. Unfortunately politicians collude with the media to present this stereotyped image of the perfect, beautiful, normal baby.
