Performance evaluation bias: A comparative study on the role of financial fixation, similarity-to-self and likeability

被引:8
作者
Carmona, Salvador [1 ]
Iyer, Govind [2 ]
Reckers, Philip M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] IE Business Sch, Calle Maria de Molina 13,5, Madrid 28006, Spain
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Accounting, Denton, TX 76201 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
Performance evaluation; Bias; National culture; Financial fixation; Similarity-to-self; Likeability;
D O I
10.1016/j.adiac.2014.04.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Performance evaluations are critical to organizational control. Dissatisfaction with systems emphasizing financial targets only has driven many companies to adopt systems using multiple performance measures. These multiple measurement systems (MMS) however may exacerbate certain cognitive biases. Using multiple performance measures can be a cognitively complex task that invites coping reactions anchored in simplifying heuristic biases, such as the likability of the target evaluatee and similarity-to-self. There are reasons to believe that these biases may manifest differently across "individualistic" or "collectivist" cultures. Our study examines three biases (financial fixation, similarity-to-self and likeability) across two distant cultures (United States and Spain) along the individualistic-collectivist dimensions. Participants are MBA students from Spain and the US. Consistent with theory-based predictions, we find that likability and similarity-to-self impact Spanish participants while financial fixation presents greater influence among US participants. These findings underscore the importance of considering national culture in designing performance measurement systems and advise about the role of specific biases, which are not culturally neutral. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Special Committee on Financial Reporting, 1994, IMPR BUS REP CUST FO
[2]   The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion [J].
Anderson, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (01) :139-167
[3]   TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH [J].
BAKAN, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1966, 66 (06) :423-&
[4]   Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting [J].
Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun ;
Mitchell, Falconer ;
Norreklit, Hanne .
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) :79-82
[5]   Reducing the effects of performance expectations on behavioral ratings [J].
Baltes, BB ;
Parker, CP .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (02) :237-267
[6]   The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy [J].
Banker, RD ;
Chang, HS ;
Pizzini, MJ .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (01) :1-23
[7]  
Bartlett G., 2014, EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING
[8]   Liking and similarity as predictors of multi-source ratings [J].
Bates, R .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2002, 31 (5-6) :540-552
[9]  
Bauer TN, 1996, ACAD MANAGE J, V39, P1538, DOI 10.2307/257068
[10]  
Berry J. W., 2011, CROSS CULTURAL PSYCH