Post-occupancy Evaluation and Thermal Comfort: State of the Art and New Approaches

被引:38
|
作者
Gossauer, Elke [1 ]
Wagner, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe, Bldg Phys & Tech Bldg Serv, Englerstr 7, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
comfort research methods; post-occupancy evaluation; workplace; comfort parameters; thermal comfort; indoor climate; general satisfaction;
D O I
10.1080/17512549.2007.9687273
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Building occupants are a valuable source of information on building performance as well as indoor environmental quality and their effects on comfort and productivity. A large number of different studies have been carried out over recent decades focusing on various aspects of the broad field of comfort, well-being and health at workplaces. Two main methodical approaches can be identified analysing the history of comfort research: laboratory tests in climate chambers, and field tests in running buildings. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are pointed out in this paper and some of the most well-known studies from Europe and the US are described with respect to their specific objectives and methodologies. No difference is made between pure comfort field studies and more general post-occupancy evaluations because the borderline is vague in most cases and the purpose of this paper is to collect as much useful information as possible on comfort research methods. A current study on overall comfort at workplaces introduces a new multivariate approach, including building-related and further contextual parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 175
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Post-occupancy evaluation and field studies of thermal comfort
    Nicol, F
    Roaf, S
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2005, 33 (04): : 338 - 346
  • [2] Post-occupancy evaluation of outdoor thermal comfort in hot arid zone
    Shawesh, Rawan
    Mohamed, Mady
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 16 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [3] A Post-occupancy Evaluation of the Influence of Wood on Environmental Comfort
    Watchman, Melanie
    Potvin, Andre
    Demers, Claude M. H.
    BIORESOURCES, 2017, 12 (04): : 8704 - 8724
  • [4] Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review
    Li, Peixian
    Froese, Thomas M.
    Brager, Gail
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 133 : 187 - 202
  • [5] Post-occupancy evaluation of the thermal environment in a green building
    Gou, Zhonghua
    Lau, Stephen Siu-Yu
    FACILITIES, 2013, 31 (7-8) : 357 - 371
  • [6] Post-occupancy evaluation in indoor comfort conditions for green office buildings
    Aycam, Idil
    Gorgulu, Leyla Senem
    Soyluk, Asena
    GRADEVINAR, 2022, 74 (09): : 721 - 737
  • [7] POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION - AN OVERVIEW
    ZIMRING, CM
    REIZENSTEIN, JE
    ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1980, 12 (04) : 429 - 450
  • [8] Who is post-occupancy evaluation for?
    Roberts, P
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2001, 29 (06): : 463 - 465
  • [9] EVALUATION + POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION - EDUCATION
    KRAUS, M
    AIA JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1976, 65 (11): : 102 - 102
  • [10] THE NEW DEMAND-DRIVEN POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION
    ZIMRING, CM
    WINEMAN, J
    CARPMAN, JR
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL AND PLANNING RESEARCH, 1988, 5 (04) : 273 - 283