Performance measurement in multi-task agencies

被引:11
作者
Thiele, Veikko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Multi-task agencies; Performance measurement; Distortion; Congruity; Limited liability; Incentives;
D O I
10.1016/j.rie.2007.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes a multi-task agency relationship with a risk-neutral and financially constraint agent. The agent's performance evaluation is incongruent, i.e. it does not reflect his contribution to firm value, and thus motivates an inefficient effort allocation across tasks. This paper investigates the improvement of the agent's performance evaluation by contrasting two alternatives for the principal: (i) to invest in assets which can be utilized to generate additional measures about the agent's performance; and (ii), to delegate this task to a supervisor. This paper demonstrates that delegation is superior whenever the costless available performance evaluation is sufficiently incongruent. (C) 2007 University of Venice. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 163
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Distortion and risk in optimal incentive contracts [J].
Baker, G .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2002, 37 (04) :728-751
[2]   The use of performance measures in incentive contracting [J].
Baker, G .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (02) :415-420
[3]  
Banker R. D., 2000, WORKING PAPER
[4]   Changing incentives in a multitask environment: evidence from a top-tier business school [J].
Brickley, JA ;
Zimmerman, JL .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2001, 7 (04) :367-396
[5]  
Christensen P.O., 2005, EC ACCOUNTING, Vii
[6]   Balancing performance measures [J].
Datar, S ;
Kulp, SC ;
Lambert, RA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (01) :75-92
[7]   Monitoring versus incentives [J].
Demougin, D ;
Fluet, C .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 45 (09) :1741-1764
[8]  
Faure- Grimaud A., 2001, RES PAPER SERIES
[9]  
FELTHAM GA, 1994, ACCOUNT REV, V69, P429
[10]   Incentives in organizations [J].
Gibbons, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 12 (04) :115-132