The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique

被引:49
|
作者
McComas, William F. [1 ]
Nouri, Noushin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, 310 Peabody Hall, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Nature of science; Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS); Science Framework; Science curriculum; Science learning standards;
D O I
10.1007/s10972-016-9474-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the inclusion of aspects of nature of science (NOS) in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). In this new standards document, NOS elements in eight categories are discussed in Appendix H along with illustrative statements (called exemplars). Many, but not all, of these exemplars are linked to the standards by their association with either the "practices of science" or "crosscutting concepts," but curiously not with the recommendations for science content. The study investigated all aspects of NOS in NGSS including the accuracy and inclusion of the supporting exemplar statements and the relationship of NOS in NGSS to other aspects of NOS to support teaching and learning science. We found that while 92 % of these exemplars are acceptable, only 78 % of those written actually appear with the standards. "Science as a way of knowing" is a recommended NOS category in NGSS but is not included with the standards. Also, several other NOS elements fail to be included at all grade levels thus limiting their impact. Finally, NGSS fails to include or insufficiently emphasize several frequently recommended NOS elements such as creativity and subjectivity. The paper concludes with a list of concerns and solutions to the challenges of NOS in NGSS.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 576
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Models of Nature of Science Dimensionality Based on the Next Generation Science Standards
    Harrison, George M.
    Seraphin, Kanesa Duncan
    Philippoff, Joanna
    Vallin, Lisa M.
    Brandon, Paul R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (08) : 1321 - 1342
  • [2] Chemicals are contaminants too: Teaching appreciation and critique of science in the era of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
    Morales-Doyle, Daniel
    Childress Price, Tiffany
    Chappell, Mindy J.
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 103 (06) : 1347 - 1366
  • [3] Chemistry and the Next Generation Science Standards
    Cooper, Melanie M.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (06) : 679 - 680
  • [4] Implementing the next generation science standards
    Penuel, William R.
    Harris, Christopher J.
    DeBarger, Angela Haydel
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2015, 96 (06) : 45 - 49
  • [5] A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards
    Tanas J.
    Fulmer G.
    Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5 (1)
  • [6] The challenges of alignment for the Next Generation Science Standards
    Fulmer, Gavin W.
    Tanas, Jamie
    Weiss, Kathleen A.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2018, 55 (07) : 1076 - 1100
  • [7] Updating the development of the Next Generation Science Standards
    Pruitt, Stephen L.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247
  • [8] COMPUTATIONAL MODELS IN THE NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS
    Lopez, Ramon E.
    Cavallo, Ann M. L.
    Hale, Greg R.
    EDULEARN15: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, : 2683 - 2691
  • [9] Developing assessments for the next generation science standards
    Erduran, Sibel
    ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2018, 25 (02) : 224 - 226
  • [10] The Next Generation Science Standards: The Features and Challenges
    Pruitt, Stephen L.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2014, 25 (02) : 145 - 156