EMULATION OF SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL (SEP) COMPONENTS WITH THE 3-SHELL HEAD MODEL AND THE PROBLEM OF GHOST POTENTIAL FIELDS WHEN USING AN AVERAGE REFERENCE IN BRAIN MAPPING

被引:82
作者
DESMEDT, JE
CHALKLIN, V
TOMBERG, C
机构
[1] Brain Research Unit, University of Brussels, Brussels
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1990年 / 77卷 / 04期
关键词
Average reference; Brain mapping; Cognitive potentials; Ghost potential fields; Radial versus tangetial dipole generator; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Three-shell head model;
D O I
10.1016/0168-5597(90)90063-J
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In brain topographic mapping, the putative location and orientation in the head space of neural generators are currently inferred from the features of negative and positive scalp potential fields. This procedure requires the use of a fairly neutral reference. The frequently advocated average reference creates problems because its effect is not merely to change a (steady) zero reference level, but to dynamically zero-center all scalp potentials at each latency. Ghost potential fields are thus created at the latencies for which the integral of scalp recorded potentials differs from zero. These distortions of brain mapping have been analyzed with a true 3-shell head model in conjuction with the emulation of SEP components. In the head model, surface potential fields. generated by dipoles or dipole sheets of various depths and orientations were computed either over the north hemisphere, so as to emulate scalp recorded SEP components, or over the entire equivalent head sphere. The spurious effects of the average reference are shown to occur because it is computed from a limited number of (scalp) electrodes which fail to survey the bottom half of the head. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 258
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
ANZISKA BJ, 1981, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V52, P531, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(81)91428-0
[3]   LOCATION OF SOURCES OF EVOKED SCALP POTENTIALS - CORRECTIONS FOR SKULL AND SCALP THICKNESSES [J].
ARY, JP ;
KLEIN, SA ;
FENDER, DH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 28 (06) :447-452
[4]   A THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE AVERAGE REFERENCE IN TOPOGRAPHIC EVOKED-POTENTIAL STUDIES [J].
BERTRAND, O ;
PERRIN, F ;
PERNIER, J .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (06) :462-464
[5]   COMPUTER-GENERATION OF SURFACE DISTRIBUTION MAPS OF MEASURES OF BRAIN ACTIVITY [J].
COPPOLA, R ;
BUCHSBAUM, MS ;
RIGAL, F .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1982, 12 (03) :191-199
[6]   SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL IN MAN - FAR FIELD POTENTIALS [J].
CRACCO, RQ ;
CRACCO, JB .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 41 (05) :460-466
[7]  
CRACCO RQ, 1986, EVOKED POTENTIALS
[8]  
Darcey T M, 1980, Prog Brain Res, V54, P128, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61617-9
[9]  
Darian-Smith, 1984, HDB PHYSL 2 1, V3, P789
[10]   SEPARATE GENERATORS WITH DISTINCT ORIENTATIONS FOR N20 AND P22 SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS TO FINGER STIMULATION [J].
DEIBER, MP ;
GIARD, MH ;
MAUGUIERE, F .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 65 (05) :321-334