A COMPARISON OF CONTINGENT PREFERENCE MODELS

被引:102
|
作者
MACKENZIE, J
机构
[1] The Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Delaware
关键词
CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; RESPONDENT AMBIVALENCE;
D O I
10.2307/1243566
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
I compare the informational efficiencies of contingent rating, contingent ranking, and two contingent paired-comparison methods as alternatives to the referendum contingent valuation method. The contingent rating method is hypothesized to be most efficient because ratings convey information on preference intensities and can uniquely represent respondent indifference or ambivalence. Survey data on hunters' ratings of alternative hypothetical hunting trips are used to estimate four alternative indirect utility models from which marginal willingness-to-pay measures for individual trip attributes are derived. Model comparison, WTP estimates, and their confidence intervals confirm the relative efficiency of the contingent rating approach.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 603
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条