AN INNOVATIVE COLD TAIL-FLICK TEST - THE COLD ETHANOL TAIL-FLICK TEST

被引:26
|
作者
WANG, JJ
HO, ST
HU, OYP
CHU, KM
机构
[1] NATL DEF MED CTR, SCH PHARM, TAIPEI, TAIWAN
[2] NATL DEF MED CTR, DEPT INTERNAL MED, TAIPEI, TAIWAN
[3] NATL DEF MED CTR, DEPT ANESTHESIOL, TAIPEI, TAIWAN
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 1995年 / 80卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199501000-00018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
An innovative antinociceptive test, the cold ethanol tail-flick test (GET), was developed for evaluating the actions of opioid analgesics. To select an optimal operation temperature range for the GET, temperatures from -5 degrees C to -30 degrees C were screened. After screening, temperatures ranging between - 20 degrees C and - 30 degrees C were both strong and effective enough to act as a noxious cold stimulus. In the following study, -20 degrees C was selected as the cold stimulus for the GET. The sensitivity and specificity of this test were challenged by opioid analgesics: an agonist (morphine) and two agonist-antagonists (buprenorphine and nalbuphine), two tranquilizers (droperidol and diazepam), and four nonopioid analgesics (acetaminophen, aspirin, indomethacin, and ketoprofen). The sensitivity of the CET was also compared with the assays using heat (Radiant heat and hot water). The AD(50) values determined by the CET for morphine, buprenorphine, and nalbuphine were 0.16 mg/kg, 0.22 mu g/kg, and 0.19 mg/kg, respectively. Naloxone, an opioid antagonist, blocked the antinociceptive effects of these opioids which were determined by the GET. Furthermore, the tranquilizers and nonopioid analgesics did not show any activity in the GET. Our results show that not only can the CET assess the antinociceptive activity of both opioid agonist and mixed agonist-antagonist, it also possess the characteristics of sensitivity, specificity, simplicity, and reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE TAIL-FLICK TEST NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED
    HOLE, K
    BERGE, OG
    TJOLSEN, A
    EIDE, PK
    GARCIACABRERA, I
    LUND, A
    ROSLAND, JH
    PAIN, 1990, 43 (03) : 391 - 392
  • [2] TAIL-FLICK TEST ADRENERGIC MECHANISMS
    DEWEY, WL
    HARRIS, LS
    HOWES, JF
    NUITE, JA
    PHARMACOLOGIST, 1968, 10 (02): : 189 - &
  • [3] TAIL-FLICK TEST CHOLINERGIC MECHANISMS
    HARRIS, LS
    DEWEY, WL
    HOWES, JF
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1968, 27 (02) : 753 - &
  • [4] THE TAIL-FLICK TEST NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED - RESPONSE
    LEE, JH
    MCCARTY, R
    PAIN, 1990, 43 (03) : 393 - 393
  • [5] RECEPTOR SELECTIVITY OF ICV MORPHINE IN THE RAT COLD-WATER TAIL-FLICK TEST
    ADAMS, JU
    GELLER, EB
    ADLER, MW
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1994, 35 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [6] RESPONSE LATENCIES IN THE TAIL-FLICK TEST DEPEND ON TAIL SKIN TEMPERATURE
    BERGE, OG
    GARCIACABRERA, I
    HOLE, K
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1988, 86 (03) : 284 - 288
  • [7] DIGITAL TAIL-FLICK APPARATUS
    HILLMAN, GR
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1975, 13 (04): : 597 - 598
  • [8] The evaluation of analgesic effects of milnacipran and sertraline in tail-flick test
    Kesim, M.
    Yanik, M. N.
    Kadioglu, M.
    Pepeoglu, D.
    Erkoseoglu, I
    Kalyoncu, N., I
    Yaris, E.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2014, 115 (01): : 3 - 6
  • [9] RESPONSE LATENCIES IN THE TAIL-FLICK TEST ARE SEVERELY AFFECTED BY TAIL SKIN TEMPERATURE
    BERGE, OG
    GARCIACABRERA, I
    HOLE, K
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 132 (02): : A37 - A37
  • [10] CHANGES IN TAIL SKIN TEMPERATURE ARE UNLIKELY TO BE A CONFOUNDING FACTOR IN THE TAIL-FLICK TEST
    LICHTMAN, AH
    MARTIN, BR
    PAIN, 1994, 57 (02) : 257 - 258