MICROSURGICAL INGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY WITH DELIVERY OF THE TESTIS - AN ARTERY AND LYMPHATIC SPARING TECHNIQUE

被引:329
|
作者
GOLDSTEIN, M [1 ]
GILBERT, BR [1 ]
DICKER, AP [1 ]
DWOSH, J [1 ]
GNECCO, C [1 ]
机构
[1] POPULAT COUNCIL, CTR BIOMED RES, NEW YORK, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1992年 / 148卷 / 06期
关键词
TESTIS; VARICOCELE; MICROSURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37035-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Conventional techniques of varicocele repair are associated with substantial risks of hydrocele formation, ligation of the testicular artery, and varicocele recurrence. We describe a microsurgical technique of varicocelectomy that significantly lowers the incidence of these complications. The testicle is delivered through a 2 to 3 cm. inguinal incision, and all external spermatic and gubernacular veins are ligated. The testis is returned to the scrotum and the spermatic cord is dissected under the operating microscope. The testicular artery and lymphatics are identified and preserved. All internal spermatic veins are doubly ligated with small hemoclips or 4-zero silk and divided. The vas deferens and its vessels are preserved. Initially, we performed 33 conventional inguinal varicocelectomies in 24 men without delivery of the testis or use of a microscope. Postoperatively, 3 unilateral hydroceles (9%) and 3 unilateral recurrences (9%) were detected. For the next 12 cases 2.5x loupes were used resulting in no hydroceles but another recurrence (8%). We then performed 640 varicocelectomies in 429 men using the microsurgical technique with delivery of the testis. Among 382 men available for followup examination from 6 months to 7 years postoperatively no hydroceles and no cases of testicular atrophy were found. A total of 4 unilateral recurrent varicoceles (0.6%) was identified. The differences between the techniques in the incidence of hydrocele formation and varicocele recurrence are highly significant (p <0.001). No wound infections occurred in any men. Four scrotal hematomas (0.6%), 1 of which required surgical drainage, occurred in the group with microsurgical ligation and delivery of the testis compared to none with the conventional technique. Preoperative and postoperative semen analyses (mean 3.57 analyses per patient) were obtained on 271 men. The changes in sperm count x 10(6) cc (36.9 to 46.8, p <0.001), per cent motility (39.6 to 45.7%, p <0.001) and per cent normal forms (48.4 to 52.10%, p <0.001) were highly significant. The pregnancy rate was 152 of 357 couples (43%) followed for a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. Delivery of the testis through a small inguinal incision provides direct visual access to all possible avenues of testicular venous drainage. The operating microscope allows identification of the testicular artery, lymphatics and small venous channels. This minimally invasive, outpatient technique results in a significant decrease in the incidence of hydrocele formation, testicular artery injury and varicocele recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:1808 / 1811
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic lymphatic and artery sparing microsurgical varicocelectomy - technique, results and long-term outcomes
    Drlik, Marcel
    Faltusova, Eva
    Valova, Zuzana
    Sedlacek, Josef
    Dite, Zdenek
    Kocvara, Radim
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2022, 18 (02) : 114.e1 - 114.e6
  • [2] Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy:: A microsurgical repair
    Kocvara, R
    Dvoracek, J
    Sedlacek, J
    Díte, Z
    Novák, K
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (05): : 1751 - 1754
  • [3] Artery and Lymphatic Sparing Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy
    Hinev, A.
    Anakievski, D.
    Kosev, P.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S261 - S261
  • [4] Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Schlegel, Peter N.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (06) : 1323 - 1326
  • [5] Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
    Mombeini, Hayat
    Khazaeili, Dinyar
    Esmaeili, Sepehr
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2020, 9 (08) : 4005 - 4008
  • [6] Inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in the adolescent: Technique and preliminary results
    Minevich, E
    Wacksman, J
    Lewis, AG
    Sheldon, CA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03): : 1022 - 1024
  • [7] Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy in adolescents: delivered versus not delivered testis procedure
    Spinelli, Claudio
    Strambi, Silvia
    Busetto, Marga
    Rossi, Leonardo
    Piscioneri, Jessica
    Pucci, Angela
    Bianco, Francesco
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) : 8254 - 8259
  • [8] Varicocelectomy: microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is the treatment of choice
    Binsaleh, Saleh
    Lo, Kirk C.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (03): : 277 - 278
  • [9] Inguinal/subinguinal artery/lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with optical magnification in children and adolescents: systematic review and metanalysis
    Pacilli, Maurizio
    Tandon, Sarthak
    Bennett, Daniel
    Nataraja, Ramesh
    Pacilli, Maurizio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 226 - 226
  • [10] Lymphatic sparing, laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a new surgical technique
    Tan, HL
    Tecson, B
    Ee, MZ
    Tantoco, J
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 20 (10) : 797 - 798