Patent privileges and the National Competition Policy - patent scope and allocation?

被引:0
|
作者
Lawson, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Australian Ctr Intellectual Property Agr, TC Beirne Sch Law, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS LAW REVIEW | 2005年 / 33卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article suggests that the modern Australian policy for strengthened patent privileges has failed to adequately address the requirement to demonstrate that the benefits of the restriction on competition outweigh the costs and that the objectives of patent privileges can only be achieved by restricting competition. These requirements are the principle articulated in the Independent Committee of Inquiry into Competition Policy in Australia (Hilmer Committee) and its subsequent codification in the Competition Principles Agreement (CPA) as part of the National Competition Policy. The article concludes that applying the requirements of the CPA to patent privileges and assessing the broader debates about the appropriate patent scope and allocation is more likely to deliver a more rational patent policy that is more likely to be suited to the Australian community.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 29
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Amgen, TKT and the erythropoietin patents - patent privileges in preference to competition
    Lawson, Charles
    AUSTRALIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY JOURNAL, 2005, 16 (03)
  • [2] Patent claims and patent scope
    Marco, Alan C.
    Sarnoff, Joshua D.
    DeGrazia, Charles A. W.
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (09)
  • [3] OUR NATIONAL PATENT POLICY
    Davis, William H.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1948, 38 (02): : 235 - 260
  • [4] Promoting innovation and competition with patent policy
    Koleda, Gilles
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2008, 18 (3-4) : 433 - 453
  • [5] Promoting innovation and competition with patent policy
    Gilles Koléda
    Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2008, 18 : 433 - 453
  • [6] Competition policy in patent cases and antitrust
    Sobel, G
    PERSPECTIVES ON PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT, 2003, 50 : 23 - 64
  • [7] PATENT SCOPE, ANTITRUST POLICY, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION
    CHANG, HF
    RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 26 (01): : 34 - 57
  • [8] Patent Claim Scope and Biosimilar Competition in the US and EU
    Bloomfield, Doni
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2024, 52 (02): : 439 - 442
  • [9] Sequential Product Innovation, Competition and Patent Policy
    Norman, George
    Pepall, Lynne
    Richards, Dan
    REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2016, 48 (03) : 289 - 306
  • [10] Sequential Product Innovation, Competition and Patent Policy
    George Norman
    Lynne Pepall
    Dan Richards
    Review of Industrial Organization, 2016, 48 : 289 - 306