EUROPEAN-LED CLIMATE POLICY VERSUS GLOBAL MITIGATION ACTION: IMPLICATIONS ON TRADE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ENERGY

被引:7
|
作者
de Cian, Enrica [1 ]
Keppo, Ilkka [2 ]
Bollen, Johannes [3 ]
Carrara, Samuel [1 ]
Foerster, Hannah [4 ]
Huebler, Michael [5 ]
Kanudia, Amit [2 ,6 ]
Paltsev, Sergey [7 ]
Sands, Ronald D. [8 ]
Schumacher, Katja [4 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei FEEM, Euro Mediterranean Ctr Climate Change CMCC, Isola San Giorgio Maggiore, I-30124 Venice, Italy
[2] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London WC1H 0NN, England
[3] Centraal Planbureau tav Johannes Bollen, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Oko Inst, D-10179 Berlin, Germany
[5] Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, D-68034 Mannheim, Germany
[6] KanORS EMR, SDF L 7B, NSEZ, Noida 201305, Uttar Pradesh, India
[7] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[8] USDA, Econ Res Serv, Washington, DC 20250 USA
关键词
Climate change; stabilization policy; international participation;
D O I
10.1142/S2010007813400022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines how changes in an international climate regime would affect the European decarbonization strategy and costs through the mechanisms of trade, technology, and innovation. We present the results from the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) model comparison study on European climate policy to 2050. Moving from a no-policy scenario to an existing-policies case reduces all energy imports, on average. Introducing a more stringent climate policy target for the EU only leads to slightly greater global emission reductions. Consumers and producers in Europe bear most of the additional burden and inevitably face some economic losses. More ambitiousmitigation action outside Europe, especially when paired with a well-operating global carbon market, could reduce the burden for Europe significantly. Because of global learning, the costs of wind and especially solar-PV in Europe would decline below the levels observed in the existing-policy case and increased R&D spending outside the EU would leverage EU R&D investments as well.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Climate mitigation policy implications for global irrigation water demand
    Vaibhav Chaturvedi
    Mohamad Hejazi
    James Edmonds
    Leon Clarke
    Page Kyle
    Evan Davies
    Marshall Wise
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20 : 389 - 407
  • [2] Climate mitigation policy implications for global irrigation water demand
    Chaturvedi, Vaibhav
    Hejazi, Mohamad
    Edmonds, James
    Clarke, Leon
    Kyle, Page
    Davies, Evan
    Wise, Marshall
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2015, 20 (03) : 389 - 407
  • [3] Impacts of Trade Friction and Climate Policy on Global Energy Trade Network
    Shepard, Jun U.
    van Ruijven, Bas J.
    Zakeri, Behnam
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (17)
  • [4] Global Energy Transformation and the Impacts of Systematic Energy Change Policy on Climate Change Mitigation
    Gunes, Hakan
    Simba, Hamis Miraji Ally
    Karadag, Haydar
    Sit, Mustafa
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [5] The economics of energy policy in China: Implications for global climate change
    Smil, V
    CHINA JOURNAL, 1999, 42 : 172 - 173
  • [6] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    Pasqualetti, Martin J.
    ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2012, 102 (03) : 735 - 736
  • [7] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    Topping, John C., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 32 (04) : 910 - 912
  • [8] Climate change and global energy security: Technology and policy options
    Tierney, Robert
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (06) : 1176 - 1177
  • [9] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    White, Gregory
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 13 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [10] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    Cooper, Richard N.
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 2012, 91 (01) : 188 - 188